BACKGROUND: Biofilm-related periprosthetic infections are catastrophic to patients and clinicians. Data suggest the addition of vitamin E to UHMWPE may have the ability to reduce biofilm formation on the surface of UHMWPE; however, previous studies were performed using stagnant broth solutions that may not have simulated a physiologic environment. In addition, the observed differences in levels of bacterial attachment, though statistically significant, may not be clinically significant. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We blended vitamin E with UHMWPE material and tested it for the ability to resist biofilm formation using a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Three additional materials were tested for comparison: highly crosslinked UHMWPE, compression-molded UHMWPE, and polyetheretherketone. We also determined whether the surface roughness of these materials facilitated biofilm formation. METHODS: Using a flow cell system, samples of each material type were placed into separate chambers. A 10% solution of brain-heart infusion broth containing 10(5) colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL was flowed through the flow cell over 48 hours. The number of bacteria that adhered to the surface was quantified and biofilm formation was observed qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy. Optical profilometry was used to determine the surface roughness of each material type. RESULTS: Vitamin E-blended UHMWPE did not reduce biofilm formation of a clinically relevant strain of MRSA compared to materials that did not have vitamin E. More specifically, vitamin E-blended materials had similar amounts of biofilm formation (~ 8 log10 CFUs/cm(2)) compared to materials not containing vitamin E (~ 8.1 log10 CFUs/cm(2)) (p > 0.4). The roughness of vitamin E-blended material surfaces (mean ± SD: 1.85 ± 0.46 µm) compared to that of materials without vitamin E (2.06 ± 1.24 µm) did not appear to influence biofilm formation. CONCLUSIONS: Under physiologically relevant conditions, vitamin E-blended UHMWPE did not have the ability to reduce the formation of biofilms by MRSA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data indicate that the addition of vitamin E to UHMWPE may not reduce clinically relevant rates of biofilm-related periprosthetic infections of total joint arthroplasty devices.
BACKGROUND: Biofilm-related periprosthetic infections are catastrophic to patients and clinicians. Data suggest the addition of vitamin E to UHMWPE may have the ability to reduce biofilm formation on the surface of UHMWPE; however, previous studies were performed using stagnant broth solutions that may not have simulated a physiologic environment. In addition, the observed differences in levels of bacterial attachment, though statistically significant, may not be clinically significant. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We blended vitamin E with UHMWPE material and tested it for the ability to resist biofilm formation using a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Three additional materials were tested for comparison: highly crosslinked UHMWPE, compression-molded UHMWPE, and polyetheretherketone. We also determined whether the surface roughness of these materials facilitated biofilm formation. METHODS: Using a flow cell system, samples of each material type were placed into separate chambers. A 10% solution of brain-heart infusion broth containing 10(5) colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL was flowed through the flow cell over 48 hours. The number of bacteria that adhered to the surface was quantified and biofilm formation was observed qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy. Optical profilometry was used to determine the surface roughness of each material type. RESULTS:Vitamin E-blended UHMWPE did not reduce biofilm formation of a clinically relevant strain of MRSA compared to materials that did not have vitamin E. More specifically, vitamin E-blended materials had similar amounts of biofilm formation (~ 8 log10 CFUs/cm(2)) compared to materials not containing vitamin E (~ 8.1 log10 CFUs/cm(2)) (p > 0.4). The roughness of vitamin E-blended material surfaces (mean ± SD: 1.85 ± 0.46 µm) compared to that of materials without vitamin E (2.06 ± 1.24 µm) did not appear to influence biofilm formation. CONCLUSIONS: Under physiologically relevant conditions, vitamin E-blended UHMWPE did not have the ability to reduce the formation of biofilms by MRSA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data indicate that the addition of vitamin E to UHMWPE may not reduce clinically relevant rates of biofilm-related periprosthetic infections of total joint arthroplasty devices.
Authors: R D Wolcott; K P Rumbaugh; G James; G Schultz; P Phillips; Q Yang; C Watters; P S Stewart; S E Dowd Journal: J Wound Care Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.072
Authors: E Gómez-Barrena; J Esteban; D Molina-Manso; H Adames; M J Martínez-Morlanes; A Terriza; F Yubero; J A Puértolas Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: P Stoodley; A Jacobsen; B C Dunsmore; B Purevdorj; S Wilson; H M Lappin-Scott; J W Costerton Journal: Water Sci Technol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 1.915
Authors: Dustin L Williams; Kassie L Woodbury; Bryan S Haymond; Albert E Parker; Roy D Bloebaum Journal: Curr Microbiol Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Nicholas M Bernthal; Alexandra I Stavrakis; Fabrizio Billi; John S Cho; Thomas J Kremen; Scott I Simon; Ambrose L Cheung; Gerald A Finerman; Jay R Lieberman; John S Adams; Lloyd S Miller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alessandro Bidossi; Monica Bortolin; Marco Toscano; Elena De Vecchi; Carlo L Romanò; Roberto Mattina; Lorenzo Drago Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Franca Vergalito; Laura Pietrangelo; Giulio Petronio Petronio; Federica Colitto; Marco Alfio Cutuli; Irene Magnifico; Noemi Venditti; Germano Guerra; Roberto Di Marco Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2019-12-26