Michael S Rendall1, Margaret M Weden, Christopher Lau, Peter Brownell, Zafar Nazarov, Meenakshi Fernandes. 1. Michael S. Rendall is with the Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, College Park. Margaret M. Weden, Christopher Lau, and Peter Brownell are with RAND, Santa Monica, CA. Zafar Nazarov is with the Department of Economics, Purdue University, Fort Wayne, IN. Meenakshi Fernandes is with the World Food Programme, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated bias in estimated obesity prevalence owing to error in parental reporting. We also evaluated bias mitigation through application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's biologically implausible value (BIV) cutoffs. METHODS: We simulated obesity prevalence of children aged 2 to 5 years in 2 panel surveys after counterfactually substituting parameters estimated from 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data for prevalence of extreme height and weight and for proportions obese in extreme height or weight categories. RESULTS: Heights reported below the first and fifth height-for-age percentiles explained between one half and two thirds, respectively, of total bias in obesity prevalence. Bias was reduced by one tenth when excluding cases with height-for-age and weight-for-age BIVs and by one fifth when excluding cases with body mass-index-for-age BIVs. Applying BIVs, however, resulted in incorrect exclusion of nonnegligible proportions of obese children. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the reporting of children's heights in the first percentile alone may reduce overestimation of early childhood obesity prevalence in surveys with parental reporting by one half to two thirds. Excluding BIVs has limited effectiveness in mitigating this bias.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated bias in estimated obesity prevalence owing to error in parental reporting. We also evaluated bias mitigation through application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's biologically implausible value (BIV) cutoffs. METHODS: We simulated obesity prevalence of children aged 2 to 5 years in 2 panel surveys after counterfactually substituting parameters estimated from 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data for prevalence of extreme height and weight and for proportions obese in extreme height or weight categories. RESULTS: Heights reported below the first and fifth height-for-age percentiles explained between one half and two thirds, respectively, of total bias in obesity prevalence. Bias was reduced by one tenth when excluding cases with height-for-age and weight-for-age BIVs and by one fifth when excluding cases with body mass-index-for-age BIVs. Applying BIVs, however, resulted in incorrect exclusion of nonnegligible proportions of obesechildren. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the reporting of children's heights in the first percentile alone may reduce overestimation of early childhood obesity prevalence in surveys with parental reporting by one half to two thirds. Excluding BIVs has limited effectiveness in mitigating this bias.
Authors: Steven L Gortmaker; Boyd A Swinburn; David Levy; Rob Carter; Patricia L Mabry; Diane T Finegood; Terry Huang; Tim Marsh; Marjory L Moodie Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephen J Blumberg; Erin B Foster; Alicia M Frasier; Jennifer Satorius; Ben J Skalland; Kari L Nysse-Carris; Heather M Morrison; Sadeq R Chowdhury; Kathleen S O'Connor Journal: Vital Health Stat 1 Date: 2012-06
Authors: Philip R Nader; Terry T-K Huang; Sheila Gahagan; Shiriki Kumanyika; Ross A Hammond; Katherine Kaufer Christoffel Journal: Child Obes Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Inge Huybrechts; John H Himes; Charlene Ottevaere; Tineke De Vriendt; Willem De Keyzer; Bianca Cox; Inge Van Trimpont; Dirk De Bacquer; Stefaan De Henauw Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Davene R Wright; Paula Lozano; Elizabeth Dawson-Hahn; Dimitri A Christakis; Wren L Haaland; Anirban Basu Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.107