| Literature DB >> 24831821 |
Gina Youcef1, Arnaud Olivier2, Clément P J L'Huillier3, Carlos Labat3, Renaud Fay4, Lina Tabcheh5, Simon Toupance2, Rosa-Maria Rodriguez-Guéant6, Damien Bergerot7, Frédéric Jaisser4, Patrick Lacolley8, Faiez Zannad2, Anne Pizard9.
Abstract
Individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are prone to develop heart failure (HF). However, the deleterious effects of MetS on the continuum of events leading to cardiac remodeling and subsequently to HF are not fully understood. This study characterized simultaneously MetS and cardiac, vascular and renal phenotypes in aging Spontaneously Hypertensive Heart Failure lean (SHHF(+/?) regrouping (+/+) and (+/cp) rats) and obese (SHHF(cp/cp), "cp" defective mutant allele of the leptin receptor gene) rats. We aimed to refine the milestones and their onset during the progression from MetS to HF in this experimental model. We found that SHHF(cp/cp )but not SHHF(+/?) rats developed dyslipidemia, as early as 1.5 months of age. This early alteration in the lipidic profile was detectable concomitantly to impaired renal function (polyuria, proteinuria but no glycosuria) and reduced carotid distensibility as compared to SHHF(+/?) rats. By 3 months of age SHHFcp/cp animals developed severe obesity associated with dislipidemia and hypertension defining the onset of MetS. From 6 months of age, SHHF(+/?) rats developed concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) while SHHF(cp/cp) rats developed eccentric LVH apparent from progressive dilation of the LV dimensions. By 14 months of age only SHHF(cp/cp) rats showed significantly higher central systolic blood pressure and a reduced ejection fraction resulting in systolic dysfunction as compared to SHHF(+/?). In summary, the metabolic and hemodynamic mechanisms participating in the faster decline of cardiac functions in SHHF(cp/cp) rats are established long before their physiological consequences are detectable. Our results suggest that the molecular mechanisms triggered within the first three months after birth of SHHF(cp/cp) rats should be targeted preferentially by therapeutic interventions in order to mitigate the later HF development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24831821 PMCID: PMC4022510 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Metabolic follow-up.
A- The monitoring of body weight shows that the onset of obesity occurs during the first three months after birth of SHHFcp/cp rats. Progressively, the SHHFcp/cp rats continue to gain weight accentuating their differences with the SHHF+/? (n = 5 to 14 rats per genotype). (B–C) Paraffin embedded tissues dissected from SHHFcp/cp and SHHF+/? rats at 14 months of age showing metabolic disorder related-tissue alterations B- Peri-renal visceral fat of SHHFcp/cp rats stained with Sirius red exhibited marked fibrosis (arrows) and hypertrophic adipocytes. C- Hemaetoxylin & Eosin staining shows the deposition of lipid droplets (arrows) in the liver dissected from SHHFcp/cp rats suggesting the development of non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis. Pictures are representative of each analyzed group (n = 5 to 7 rats per genotype). Values are mean ± sem. Non-parametric ANOVA analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of an interaction between aging and genotype. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 for comparing SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at the same time point.
Blood parameters.
| Genotype | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | ANOVA | |||
| Parameters | ||||||||
| Age, month | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 14 | Genotype | Age | Interaction | |
|
| 7–12 | 5–10 | 7 | 5 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Na+ | 140.8±0.5 | 141.4±0.6 | 143.7±0.7 | 143.0±0.8 | ns | 0.0003 | ns | |
| K+ | 4.8±0.2 | 4.9±0.2 | 5.3±0.2 | 4.7±0.2 | ns | ns | ns | |
| Na+/K+ ratio | 29.8±0.9 | 28.8±1.0 | 28.1±1.2 | 30.3±1.4 | ns | ns | ns | |
|
| ||||||||
| Total Cholesterol | 0.7±0.2 | 0.9±0.3 | 0.8±0.3 | 4.6±0.4 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| HDL | 0.2±0.0 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.4±0.0 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| LDL | 0.4±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.4±0.1 | 1.3±0.2 | 0.0026 | 0.0045 | 0.0141 | |
| FFA | 1.1±0.4 | 1.7±0.5 | 1.1±0.5 | 5.2±0.6 | <0.0001 | 0.0045 | 0.0023 | |
| TG | 0.3±0.7 | 0.8±0.0 | 0.5±0.1 | 14.6±1.1 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 83±5 | 100±12 | 107±5 | 92±9 | ns | ns | ns | |
|
| 12±2 | 25±4 | 16±4 | 226±92 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.009 | |
|
| 0.9±0.3 | 2.6±0.8 | 2.0±0.3 | 14.6±5.9 | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.022 | |
|
| 2.13±0.60 | 1.88±0.69 | 4.60±0.79 | 8.00±0.93 | 0.0489 | <0.0001 | 0.0244 | |
|
| 117±18 | 116±24 | 212±29 | 207±29 | ns | 0.0013 | ns | |
|
| 6.4±0.5 | 19.7±0.8 | 5.3±0.7 | 12.8±0.8 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0007 | |
Na, sodium, K, potassium; HDL, High Density Lipoprotein; LDL, Low density Lipoprotein; FFA, Free Fatty Acids; TG, triglyceride; BNP, Brain Natriuretic Peptide. Values are the mean±sem. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of interaction between aging and genotype. Student's T test * p<0.05; ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 to compare SHHF cp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at same time point; § p<0.05; §§p<0.01, §§§ p<0.001 to compare T14-mo vs T1.5-mo for a same genotype; N stands for the number of samples; ns stands for not significant.
Renal parameters.
| Genotype | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | ANOVA | ||||
| Parameters | |||||||||
| Age, month | 1.5 | 1.5 | 12 | 12 | Genotype | Age | Interaction | ||
|
| 5–10 | 6–10 | 7 | 5 | |||||
|
| 0.64±0.03 | 0.69±0.01 | 1.69±0.04§§§ | 1.97±0.05 | 0.0007 | <0.0001 | 0.0114 | ||
|
| 0.27±0.01 | 0.32±0.01 | 0.39±0.02§§§ | 0.49±0.02 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0459 | ||
|
| 6179±777 | 7527±905 | 14969±1095§§ | 18864±1347 | ns | <0.0001 | ns | ||
|
| 21.5±1.8 | 22.5±1.8 | 30.7±3.2§ | 41.5±2.9**§§§ | ns | <0.0001 | 0.019 | ||
|
| 2583±103 | 1630±120 | 2268±103§§§ | 986±126**§§§ | 0.002 | <0.0001 | ns | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Na+ | 1668±191 | 2639±177 | 1065±81§§ | 1136±93§§§ | 0.001 | <0.0001 | 0.014 | ||
| K+ | 2965±321 | 5685±298 | 2907±267 | 2886±289§§§ | 0.0001 | 0.0009 | 0.001 | ||
| Na+/K+ ratio | 0.57±0.02 | 0.46±0.01 | 0.38±0.03§§ | 0.38±0.03§ | 0.046 | <0.0001 | 0.012 | ||
|
| 72.8±5.5 | 81.0±5.2 | 115.2±4.7§§ | 66.4±5.1 | 0.0001 | 0.0434 | 0.0005 | ||
|
| 3.66±1.51 | 14.02±1.78 | 9.40±0.88§§§ | 7.18±1.01§§§ | 0.0195 | ns | 0.0002 | ||
|
| 35±4 | 25±2 | 42±2 | 11±2 | ns | <0.0001 | 0.0004 | ||
KW, Kidney Weight; Na, sodium, K, potassium, eGFR, estimated Glomerular filtration rate; Values are the mean±sem. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of interaction between aging and genotype. Student's T test *, ** and *** p<0.01, p<0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively when comparing SHHF +/? vs. SHHFcp/cp at same time point; § p<0.05, §§ p<0.01 and §§§ p<0.001 to compare T14-mo vs T1.5-mo for a same genotype; N stands for the number of samples; ns stands for not significant.
Figure 2Renal function follow-up.
The worsening of renal function associated with the cp/cp genotype was evaluated while rats were placed individually in metabolic cages for 3 consecutive days (n = 5 to 10 rats per genotype). The alteration of renal function observed in SHHFcp/cp rats is shown by A- increased urine excretion as early as 1.5 months of age, B- increased proteinuria and C- by major deteriorations of renal histological ultrastructure at 14 months for SHHFcp/cp rats ie. massive protein casts (pc), fibrosis, tubular atrophy and enlarged glomerular surfaces (insert in the bottom right panel). Pictures are representative of each analyzed group (n = 5 to 14 rats per genotype); 5-fold magnification for the global kidney picture and 20-fold for the glomeruli (inserts). Values are mean ± sem. Non-parametric ANOVA analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of an interaction between aging and genotype. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 for comparing SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at the same time point.
Cardiac parameters.
| Genotype | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | ANOVA | ||||
| Parameters | |||||||||
| Age, month | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 14 | Genotype | Age | Interaction | ||
|
| 10 | 10 | 7 | 5 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| HW, g | 0.75±0.03 | 0.77±0.04 | 1.95±0.04§§§ | 2.08±0.05 | ns | <0.0001 | ns | ||
| Tibia length, cm | 2.30±0.03 | 2.13±0.03 | 4.31±0.04§§ | 3.98±0.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0538 | ||
| HW/Tibia, g/cm | 0.32±0.01 | 0.36±0.01 | 0.45±0.01§ | 0.52±0.01 | 0.0004 | <0.0001 | ns | ||
|
| |||||||||
| LVIDd | 5.6±0.2 | 5.4±0.1 | 9.6±.01§§ | 10.7±0.2 | 0.013 | <0.0001 | 0.002 | ||
| Septum Thickness | 1.2±0.0 | 1.1±0.0 | 2.4±0.0§§§ | 1.6±0.1 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Posterior Wall Thickness | 0.9±0.0 | 1.0±0.0 | 1.6±0.0§§§ | 1.1±0.0 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| % myocardial fibrosis | 0.10±0.01 | 0.12±0.02 | 1.14±0.56 | 4.75±1.02*§ | 0.0005 | 0.0013 | 0.0372 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| A, mm/s | 31±4 | 24±2 | 41±7 | 92±25 | ns | ns | ns | ||
| E, mm/s | 96±5 | 108±6 | 101±2 | 124±7 | ns | ns | ns | ||
| E/A | 3.2±0.4 | 4.0±0.9 | 2.9±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | ns | ns | ns | ||
| EDT, ms | 14±1 | 14±1 | 32±1§§ | 20±5 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
HW, Heart Weight; LV, Left Ventricle; LVIDd, Left Ventricle Internal Diameters at diastole; E and A, early and late filling waves; EDT, E-vel Deceleration Time. These echocardiographic parameters are the mean ± sem of the average of three to four consecutive cardiac cycles for each rat. % of Myocardial fibrosis was determined on Sirius red stained heart sections by measuring the percentage of fibrotic area to whole heart section area using Image J software. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of interaction between aging and genotype. Student's T test * p<0.05; ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 to compare SHHF+/? vs. SHHFcp/cp at same time point; ; § p<0.05, §§ p<0.01 and §§§ p<0.001 to compare T14-mo vs T1.5-mo for a same genotype; N stands for the number of rats; ns stands for not significant.
Figure 3Cardiac follow-up.
Transthoracic echocardiograms were performed on isoflurane-anesthetized SHHF at different time points throughout the protocol (1.5; 6; 9 and 14 months of age, n = 5 to 10 rats per genotype). A- Fractional Shortening (FS) and B- Ejection Fraction (EF) showed the progressive but faster decline of heart systolic function in SHHFcp/cp rats compared to SHHF+/? controls. C- LV mass as well as D- Left Ventricular (LV) Internal Diameters at end systole (LVIDs) were significantly higher in the SHHFcp/cp group from 6 months and continued to rise till 12 and 14 months of age respectively demonstrating LV hypertrophy and dilation E- Red Sirius staining performed on heart sections obtained from SHHF+/? and SHHFcp/cp rats at 1.5 and 14 months of age showed greater myocardial fibrosis in 14-month-old SHHFcp/cp rats compared to SHHF+/? from the same age (n = 5 to 7 rats per genotype). Mean ± sem. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of an interaction between aging and genotype. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 for comparing SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at the same age.
Mechanical properties of the carotid artery.
| Genotype | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | ANOVA | ||
| Parameters | |||||||
| Age, month | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14 | 14 | Genotype | Age | Interaction |
|
| 14 | 12 | 7 | 5 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Diastolic | 0.78±0.02 | 0.80±0.05 | 083±0.05 | 0.96±0.04§ | ns | 0.03 | ns |
| Systolic | 1.01±0.02 | 0.99±0.05 | 1.01±0.03 | 1.13±0.05 | ns | ns | ns |
| Mean Blood Pressure, mmHg | 113±5 | 113±8 | 114±13 | 150±9 | 0.046 | 0.045 | 0.047 |
|
| |||||||
| Diameter, mm | 0.88±0.03 | 0.88±0.05 | 0.92±0.04 | 1.05±0.04§ | ns | 0.046 | ns |
| Compliance, mm2/mmHg−1.103 | 5.88±0.29 | 4.15±0.26 | 4.45±0.53 | 2.79±0.40 | 0.0002 | 0.002 | ns |
| Distensibility, mm.Hg−3 | 9.98±0.71 | 7.33±0.73 | 7.25±1.26 | 2.95±0.38 | 0.002 | 0.002 | ns |
| Einc, kPa | 388±58 | 577±110 | 421±125 | 1004±133* | 0.002 | 0.049 | 0.08 |
| WS, kPa | 234±28 | 245±40 | 142±26 | 242±35 | ns | ns | ns |
| MCSA, mm2 | 0.084±0.013 | 0.087±0.019 | 0.149±0.014§ | 0.132±0.060§ | ns | <0.00001 | ns |
MBP, Mean Blood Pressure; Einc, Incremental Elastic-modulus; WS, Wall Stress; MCSA, Mean Cross Sectional Area. Values are mean ± sem. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of interaction between aging and genotype. Fisher's LSD Multiple-Comparison Test * p<0.05 to compare SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at the same age; § p<0.05 to compare of 14 month-old vs. 1.5-month-old rats of the same genotype; N stands for the number of rats; ns stands for not significant.
Blood pressure follow-up in conscious SHHF rats.
| Genotype | SHHF+/? | SHHFcp/cp | ANOVA | |||||||||
| Age, month | 2.5 | 5 | 13 | 14 | 2.5 | 5 | 13 | 14 | Genotype | Age | Interaction | |
|
| 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | ||||
|
| 176±4 | 182±12 | 187±6 | 195±8 | 150±8 | 163±14 | 182±7 | 207±9 | ns | <0.0001 | ns | |
|
| 397±5 | 383±12 | 466±13 | 460±6 | 368±10* | 390±6 | 401±20* | 412±18* | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0020 | |
SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; HR, Heart Rate; bpm, beats per minute. Values are mean ± sem. Non-parametric ANOVAs analysis with two factors allowed the evaluation of interaction between aging and genotype. N stands for the number of rats; ns stands for not significant. Student's T test * p<0.05 to compare SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? at same age.
Figure 4Hemodynamic phenotyping.
Invasive blood pressure measurements were obtained on anesthetized rats during vascular phenotyping of the animals. A- Systolic (SBP), Diastolic (DBP) Blood Pressures and Pulse Pressure (PP) were measured at both the earliest and latest ages. Results showed that over time only SHHFcp/cp rats increased their SBP and PP becoming significantly higher at 14 months of age compared to SHHF+/? animals. B- Distensibility, C- Incremental Elastic modulus (Einc) to Wall Stress (WS) curves and D- WS at Einc 600 kPa were recorded. Values are mean ± sem of 5 to 14 measurements depending on the genotype and age. Fisher's LSD Multiple-Comparison Test * p<0.05 for comparing of SHHFcp/cp vs. SHHF+/? rats at the same age; § p<0.05 for comparison of 14 month-old vs. 1.5-month-old rats of the same genotype.