Charles P Osingada1, Gloria Ninsiima, Rose N Chalo, Joshua K Muliira, Tom Ngabirano. 1. Author Affiliations: School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda (Mr Osingada and Ngabirano, Ms Ninsiima, and Dr Chalo); and College of Nursing, Department of Adult Health & Critical Care, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman (Dr Muliira).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical cancer (CC) has been rising in sub-Saharan Africa, and health authorities in this region have responded by increasing the availability of cheap or no-cost CC screening services (CCSS), public health education, and others. However, the efforts have not yet resulted into the expected uptake of CCSS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS at a no-cost reproductive health clinic managed by nurse-midwives. METHODS: A descriptive design and a structured interview questionnaire were used to collect data from 236 women attending the reproductive health clinic. Logistic regression statistics were used to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 28.7 years, and only 29% had received CC screening. The significant determinants of uptake of CCSS were concern about the gender of the healthcare professional (HCP) (odds ratio [OR], 5.03; P = .001), age older than 25 years (OR, 3.09; P = .005), contraceptive use (OR, 0.28; P = .02), encouragement by HCPs (OR, 0.16; P = .00), and perceived quality of CCSS (OR, 0.08; P = .00). CONCLUSIONS: Gender of the HCP and encouragement or reminders by the HCP influence uptake of CCSS. Because nurse-midwives have successfully led strategies to promote other integrated reproductive health services, they can also play a key role in enhancing uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Interventions to enhance service quality and deliberate policies requiring HCP to recommend encourage and remind clients may help to enhance uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical cancer (CC) has been rising in sub-Saharan Africa, and health authorities in this region have responded by increasing the availability of cheap or no-cost CC screening services (CCSS), public health education, and others. However, the efforts have not yet resulted into the expected uptake of CCSS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS at a no-cost reproductive health clinic managed by nurse-midwives. METHODS: A descriptive design and a structured interview questionnaire were used to collect data from 236 women attending the reproductive health clinic. Logistic regression statistics were used to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 28.7 years, and only 29% had received CC screening. The significant determinants of uptake of CCSS were concern about the gender of the healthcare professional (HCP) (odds ratio [OR], 5.03; P = .001), age older than 25 years (OR, 3.09; P = .005), contraceptive use (OR, 0.28; P = .02), encouragement by HCPs (OR, 0.16; P = .00), and perceived quality of CCSS (OR, 0.08; P = .00). CONCLUSIONS: Gender of the HCP and encouragement or reminders by the HCP influence uptake of CCSS. Because nurse-midwives have successfully led strategies to promote other integrated reproductive health services, they can also play a key role in enhancing uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Interventions to enhance service quality and deliberate policies requiring HCP to recommend encourage and remind clients may help to enhance uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings.
Authors: Meng Li; Agnes Nyabigambo; Patricia Navvuga; Elly Nuwamanya; Afra Nuwasiima; Paschal Kaganda; Francis T Asiimwe; Elisabeth Vodicka; Noleb M Mugisha; Aggrey Mukose; Doris K Kwesiga; Solomon J Lubinga; Louis P Garrison; Joseph B Babigumira Journal: Papillomavirus Res Date: 2017-06-08
Authors: R Rahman; M D Clark; Z Collins; F Traore; E M Dioukhane; H Thiam; Y Ndiaye; E L De Jesus; N Danfakha; K E Peters; T Komarek; A M Linn; P E Linn; K E Wallner; M Charles; M Hasnain; C E Peterson; J A Dykens Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2019 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Najjuka Sarah Maria; Connie Olwit; Mark Mohan Kaggwa; Rose Chalo Nabirye; Tom Denis Ngabirano Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 2.742