Literature DB >> 24830831

Paramedics accurately apply the pediatric assessment triangle to drive management.

Marianne Gausche-Hill, Marc Eckstein, Timothy Horeczko, Nancy McGrath, Aileen Kurobe, Linda Ullum, Amy H Kaji, Roger J Lewis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an evaluation of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle (PAT) as an assessment tool for use by paramedic providers in the prehospital care of pediatric patients.
METHODS: Paramedics from Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) received training in the Pediatric Education for Prehospital Professionals (PEPP) course, PAT study procedures, and completed training in applying the PAT to assess children 0-14 years of age. A convenience sample of LAFD paramedic assessments of the pediatric patients transported to 29 participating institutions, over an 18-month period ending July 2010, were eligible for inclusion. Patients who were not transported were excluded from the study, as were the assessments of children with special health-care needs (CSHCN). PAT Study Forms, emergency medical services (EMS) report forms, and emergency department (ED) and hospital charts were entered into a secure database. Two study investigators, blinded to paramedic PAT assessment, reviewed hospital charts and determined the category of illness or injury.
RESULTS: A total of 1,552 PAT Study Forms were collected. Overall, 1,168 of the patient (75%) assessments met inclusion criteria, were transported, and had all three data points (PAT Study Form, paramedic EMS report form, and ED/hospital chart) available for analysis. When paramedics used the PAT to identify abnormalities in the three arms of the triangle (PAT Paramedic Pattern) and applied that pattern to form a general impression (PAT Paramedic Impression), the agreement resulted in a κ coefficient of 0.93 [95% CI: 0.91-0.95]. The PAT paramedic impression was congruent with field management, as the majority of patients received consistent interventions with local EMS protocols. The PAT Paramedic Impression for instability demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.4% [95% CI: 72.6-81.5%], a specificity of 90.0% [95% CI: 87.1-91.5%] with a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 7.7 [95% CI: 5.9-9.1] and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.3 [95% CI: 0.2-0.3].
CONCLUSION: The PAT is a rapid assessment tool that can be readily and reliably used by paramedics in the prehospital setting. The PAT should be used in conjunction with other assessments but can safely drive initial field management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric Assessment Triangle; paramedics, assessment; prehospital

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24830831     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.912706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  5 in total

1.  Pediatric Behavioral Health-Related EMS Encounters: A Statewide Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer N Fishe; Sean Lynch
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  A Statewide Study of the Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services' Management of Pediatric Asthma.

Authors:  Jennifer N Fishe; Eugene Palmer; Erik Finlay; Carmen Smotherman; Shiva Gautam; Phyllis Hendry; Leslie Hendeles
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.454

3.  A Statewide Analysis of EMS' Pediatric Transport Destination Decisions.

Authors:  Kayla McManus; Erik Finlay; Sam Palmer; Jennifer F Anders; Phyllis Hendry; Jennifer N Fishe
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Peter E Fischer; Mark Gestring; Holly N Michaels; Gregory J Jurkovich; E Brooke Lerner; Mary E Fallat; Theodore R Delbridge; Joshua B Brown; Eileen M Bulger
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.697

5.  Initial assessment, level of care and outcome among children who were seen by emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Thomas Karlsson; Christer Axelsson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.