AIM: To investigate the role of exercise training the past 25 years on major physiological-psychological outcomes studied thus far in this patient population. METHODS: PubMed, MedlinePlus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SportDiscus, Embase, Scorpus, and Google Scholar were searched from September to November 2013 to identify exercise training studies that used objective measurements of fitness and/or patient reported outcomes assessed pre and post-exercise training with statistical analyses performed in at least one of the following outcome measurements: Cardiorespiratory function, body composition, muscular strength, fatigue, depression, and overall quality of life. Five reviewers independently identified the studies that met the criteria for the review and discrepancies were resolved by consensus among all authors. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included in this review with 5 from the period between 1989-1999, 11 from 2000-2006, and 35 from 2007-2013. The evolution of study designs changed from aerobic only exercise training interventions (1989-1999), to a combination of aerobic and resistance training (2000-2006), to studies including an arm of resistance training or examining the effects of resistance training as the main mode of exercise (2007-2013). Overall, the benefits of exercise showed improvements in cardiorespiratory function, body composition, strength, and patient reported outcomes including fatigue, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Exercise training appears to be safe for most breast cancer patients and improvements in physiological, psychological, and functional parameters can be attained with regular participation in moderate intensity exercise.
AIM: To investigate the role of exercise training the past 25 years on major physiological-psychological outcomes studied thus far in this patient population. METHODS: PubMed, MedlinePlus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SportDiscus, Embase, Scorpus, and Google Scholar were searched from September to November 2013 to identify exercise training studies that used objective measurements of fitness and/or patient reported outcomes assessed pre and post-exercise training with statistical analyses performed in at least one of the following outcome measurements: Cardiorespiratory function, body composition, muscular strength, fatigue, depression, and overall quality of life. Five reviewers independently identified the studies that met the criteria for the review and discrepancies were resolved by consensus among all authors. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included in this review with 5 from the period between 1989-1999, 11 from 2000-2006, and 35 from 2007-2013. The evolution of study designs changed from aerobic only exercise training interventions (1989-1999), to a combination of aerobic and resistance training (2000-2006), to studies including an arm of resistance training or examining the effects of resistance training as the main mode of exercise (2007-2013). Overall, the benefits of exercise showed improvements in cardiorespiratory function, body composition, strength, and patient reported outcomes including fatigue, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Exercise training appears to be safe for most breast cancerpatients and improvements in physiological, psychological, and functional parameters can be attained with regular participation in moderate intensity exercise.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Complementary Alternative Medicine; Exercise training; Oncology; Patients reported outcomes; VO2peak
Authors: Jennifer A Ligibel; Ann Partridge; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Nancy Campbell; Laura Shockro; Taylor Salinardi; Taylor Salinardri; Eric P Winer Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: R Nikander; H Sievänen; K Ojala; P-L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; T Palva; C Blomqvist; R Luoto; T Saarto Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Bernardine M Pinto; Georita M Frierson; Carolyn Rabin; Joseph J Trunzo; Bess H Marcus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: V Mock; M B Burke; P Sheehan; E M Creaton; M L Winningham; S McKenney-Tedder; L P Schwager; M Liebman Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Carolina Fernández-Lao; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva; Angelica Ariza-Garcia; Carol Courtney; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Manuel Arroyo-Morales Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Christina M Dieli-Conwright; Frank C Sweeney; Kerry S Courneya; Debu Tripathy; Nathalie Sami; Kyuwan Lee; Thomas A Buchanan; Darcy Spicer; Leslie Bernstein; Joanne E Mortimer; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lyn W Freeman; Rebecca White; Chelsea G Ratcliff; Sue Sutton; Mary Stewart; J Lynn Palmer; Judith Link; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: C E Short; A Rebar; E L James; M J Duncan; K S Courneya; R C Plotnikoff; R Crutzen; C Vandelanotte Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: C E Short; E L James; A L Rebar; M J Duncan; K S Courneya; R C Plotnikoff; R Crutzen; N Bidargaddi; C Vandelanotte Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 3.603