| Literature DB >> 24829773 |
Seied Saeid Esmaeili1, Faramarz Fallahi2, Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki3, Gholamreza Noormohammadi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome can cause cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the affected subjects. With 20 to 30% prevalence rate among the adult population of most countries, it is considered a pandemic problem. The guidelines currently available on the management of the specific components of metabolic syndrome highlight some lifestyle changes such as enhanced physical activity and weight reduction. Adherence to Mediterranean-style diet has been shown to be associated with lower risk of metabolic syndrome in some clinical studies.Entities:
Keywords: Diet therapy; Metabolic Syndrome X; Obesity
Year: 2014 PMID: 24829773 PMCID: PMC4005435 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.14601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J ISSN: 2074-1804 Impact factor: 0.611
Criteria for Clinical Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Adults
| Criteria | Results |
|---|---|
|
| 95 |
|
| 150 |
| drug treatment for elevated triglycerides | |
|
| 40 in male |
| 50 in female | |
| drug treatment for reduced HDL-C | |
|
| Systolic 130 and/or diastolic 85 |
| antihypertensive drug treatment in | |
| a patient with a history of hypertension | |
|
| 100 |
| drug treatment of elevated glucose |
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics [a, b, c]
| Variables | Groups Experimental, n = 30 | Control, n = 31 | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 46.11 ± 10.31 | 44.70 ± 11.55 | 0.639 |
|
| 105.17 ± 11.75 | 103.52 ± 11.80 | 0.586 |
|
| 83.63 ± 14.64 | 79.77 ± 12.65 | 0.275 |
|
| 140.43 ± 19.61 | 139.10 ± 17.68 | 0.781 |
|
| 89.00 ± 8.77 | 87.35 ± 6.80 | 0.415 |
|
| 201.63 ± 42.93 | 220.90 ± 53.60 | 0.127 |
|
| 41.10 ± 7.70 | 42.42 ± 6.88 | 0.483 |
|
| 125.50 ± 31.16 | 131.55 ± 44.50 | 0.542 |
|
| 226.83 ± 119.37 | 206.10 ± 143.19 | 0.542 |
|
| 123.63 ± 59.63 | 115.94 ± 38.33 | 0.550 |
|
| 8.40 ± 6.93 | 7.59 ± 8.91 | 0.697 |
|
| 33.38 ± 5.47 | 32.61 ± 4.59 | 0.552 |
|
| 0.61 ± 0.18 | 0.53 ± 0.25 | 0.139 |
|
| 0.731 | ||
| Female | 25 (83.3) | 27 (87.1) | |
| Male | 5 (16.7) | 4 (12.9) | |
|
| < 0.999 | ||
| Married | 24 (80.0) | 25 (80.6) | |
| Single | 6 (20.0) | 6 (19.4) | |
|
| < 0.999 | ||
| Lower Diploma | 24 (80.0) | 24 (77.4) | |
| Upper Diploma | 6 (20.0) | 7 (22.6) |
a Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; fasting glucose, FBS; HDL, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride.
b Continuous variables analyzed using independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test.
c Data are presented as mean ± SD.
d Categorical variables analyzed using Chi-square test.
Comparison of Variables[a]
| Variables | Time | Difference | P Value [ | Difference, 95% CI | P Value [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | |||||
| 0.004 | ||||||
| Experimental | 83.70 ± 14.89 | 82.26 ± 15.67 | -1.44 | < 0.001 | -1.18 | |
| Control | 79.77 ± 12.65 | 79.52 ± 12.70 | -0.25 | 0.385 | (-2.05,-0.32) | |
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| Experimental | 105.3811.90± | 102.64 ± 11.80 | -2.74 | < 0.001 | -3.38 | |
| Control | 103.42 ± 11.60 | 104.06 ± 11.14 | 0.64 | 0.330 | (-4.80,-1.96) | |
|
| 0.251 | |||||
| Experimental | 140.62 ± 19.93 | 140.83 ± 17.66 | 0.21 | 0.469 | -1.79 | |
| Control | 139.10 ± 17.68 | 141.10 ± 19.66 | 2 | 0.327 | (-8.88,5.29) | |
|
| 0.053 | |||||
| Experimental | 88.97 ± 8.92 | 86.24 ± 8.57 | -2.73 | 0.066 | -4.14 | |
| Control | 87.35 ± 6.80 | 88.77 ± 8.86 | 1.42 | 0.273 | (-7.85,0.42) | |
|
| 0.480 | |||||
| Experimental | 201.79 ± 43.68 | 186.34 ± 28.61 | -15.45 | 0.035 | 23.39 | |
| Control | 238.97 ± 108.99 | 200.13 ± 50.75 | -38.84 | 0.002 | (-12.71,59.49) | |
|
| 0.986 | |||||
| Experimental | 41.07 ± 7.84 | 42.72 ± 8.61 | 1.65 | 0.087 | 1.14 | |
| Control | 43.39 ± 9.35 | 43.90 ± 8.45 | 0.51 | 0.220 | (-2.33,4.61) | |
|
| 0.317 | |||||
| Experimental | 125.55 ± 31.71 | 108.17 ± 26.79 | -17.38 | < 0.001 | -4.21 | |
| Control | 131.55 ± 44.50 | 118.39 ± 41.68 | -13.16 | 0.013 | (-17.44,9.00) | |
|
| 0.119 | |||||
| Experimental | 229.38 ± 120.65 | 174.00 ± 60.88 | -55.38 | < 0.001 | -40.48 | |
| Control | 206.10 ± 143.19 | 191.19 ± 127.52 | -14.91 | 0.258 | (-84.04,3.09) | |
|
| 0.126 | |||||
| Experimental | 124.79 ± 60.34 | 114.59 ± 39.71 | -10.2 | 0.125 | -17.03 | |
| Control | 115.94 ± 38.33 | 123.03 ± 53.80 | 7.09 | 0.116 | (-32.49,-2.11) | |
|
| 0.159 | |||||
| Experimental | 12.07 ± 18.74 | 10.77 ± 20.26 | -1.3 | 0.119 | -4.62 | |
| Control | 7.61 ± 8.91 | 11.08 ± 25.84 | 3.47 | 0.036 | (-15.39,6.13) | |
|
| < 0.001 | |||||
| Experimental | 33.325.55± | 32.73 ± 5.78 | -0.59 | < 0.001 | -0.48 | |
| Control | 32.61 ± 4.59 | 32.51 ± 4.56 | -0.1 | 0.361 | (-0.83,-0.13) | |
|
| 0.032 | |||||
| Experimental | 0.61 ± 0.18 | 0.55 ± 0.23 | -0.06 | 0.039 | -0.10 | |
| Control | 0.53 ± 0.25 | 0.57 ± 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.296 | (-0.20,-0.004) | |
a Data are presented as mean ± SD.
b P value based on the paired sample t-test.
c P value based on the independent test or Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 1.Significant Differencein the Severity of Metabolic Syndrome