Huimeng Wu1, Zhongwu Wang, Hongyou Fan. 1. Advanced Materials Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory , Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, United States.
Abstract
We demonstrate for the first time a new mechanical annealing method that can significantly improve the structural quality of self-assembled nanoparticle arrays by eliminating defects at room temperature. Using in situ high-pressure small-angle X-ray scattering, we show that deformation of nanoparticle assembly in the presence of gigapascal level stress rebalances interparticle forces within nanoparticle arrays and transforms the nanoparticle film from an amorphous assembly with defects into a quasi-single crystalline superstructure. Our results show that the existence of the hydrostatic pressure field makes the transformation both thermodynamically and kinetically possible/favorable, thus providing new insight for nanoparticle self-assembly and integration with enhanced mechanical performance.
We demonstrate for the first time a new mechanical annealing method that can significantly improve the structural quality of self-assembled nanoparticle arrays by eliminating defects at room temperature. Using in situ high-pressure small-angle X-ray scattering, we show that deformation of nanoparticle assembly in the presence of gigapascal level stress rebalances interparticle forces within nanoparticle arrays and transforms the nanoparticle film from an amorphous assembly with defects into a quasi-single crystalline superstructure. Our results show that the existence of the hydrostatic pressure field makes the transformation both thermodynamically and kinetically possible/favorable, thus providing new insight for nanoparticle self-assembly and integration with enhanced mechanical performance.
Precise engineering of periodic
nanoparticle superstructures (so-called artificial solids or materials)
attracts a lot of attention because of their promise for optical,
electronic, and magnetic devices.[1−5] The integration of engineered nanoparticle materials is expected
to be highly sensitive to structural factors, such as interparticle
spacing and degree of long-range order, requiring the development
of robust self-assembly with controlled nanoparticle aggregations
over macroscopic length scales. To date, engineering of nanoparticle
assemblies has relied mainly on specific interparticle chemical or
physical interactions, such as van der Waals forces, electrostatics,
dipole–dipole interactions, DNA-hybridization, etc.[6]Previous work by us, as well as others,
has shown nanoparticle
self-assembly to result generally in polycrystalline 2- or 3D close-packed
arrangements through balancing interparticle forces at ambient conditions.[4,7−11] These nanoparticle assemblies often exhibit defects such as random
packed domains, grain boundary, and vacancy that are lack of continuous
pathway for electron or energy transfer. Efforts have been made to
achieve “single crystal-like” domain structures with
precise long-range order for their definite advantages for electron
or energy transfer. For example, solvent and thermal annealing methods
were developed to form long-range ordered nanoparticle superlattices.[12,13] Thermal annealing and solvent vapor annealing, although accelerate
structural relaxation and induce grain growth, do not significantly
improve the crystal quality of nanoparticle films due to either sintering
of nanoparticles or remaining of film cracking. Heterogeneous precipitation
method was also reported,[14] enabling fabrication
of well-shaped supercrystal solids. These works were all conducted
under ambient pressure. Things change much and differently under high
external pressure.[5,15−18] Under high-pressure conditions,
the free-energy change of the materials system (due to the PV term
in the Gibbs free energy G = E +
PV – TS) may allow a new opportunity to tune phase or configuration
of the materials, which inspires us to study how external pressure
(or stress) makes influence of nanoparticle self-assembly.Structural
evolution of gold nanoparticle arrays upon pressurization.
(a) A representative HP-SAXS image of gold nanoparticle arrays at
ambient pressure. (b) SAXS pattern integrated from image in (a). SAXS
patterns of the gold nanoparticle arrays during compression (c–g)
and release (h).In this work, we present
experimental studies to demonstrate a
new mechanical annealing method that can significantly improve the
structural quality of self-assembled nanoparticle arrays by eliminating
the defects and inducing orientated crystallization at room temperature.
Using in situ high-pressure small-angle X-ray scattering
(HP-SAXS), we show that pressure-induced annealing of nanoparticle
assembly in the presence of ∼6 GPa hydrostatic pressure rebalances
interparticle forces within nanoparticle arrays and transforms the
nanoparticle film from an amorphous assembly with defects into a quasi-single
crystalline superstructure. Our results demonstrate that the existence
of a hydrostatic high-pressure field makes the transformation both
thermodynamically and kinetically possible/favorable.The platform
for the mechanical annealing studies is a diamond
anvil cell (DAC).[19] The materials system
for our studies comprises gold nanoparticles capped with an organic
monolayer of alkane chains and their ordered films that were formed
through rapid evaporation of gold nanoparticle solutions. Samples
of gold nanoparticle thin films were loaded into a DAC. Silicone oil
was used as a pressure transmitting medium to produce hydrostatic
pressure field within the DAC. Pieces of ruby crystal were added together
with the gold nanoparticle sample so that the pressure inside the
DAC chamber can be ascertained by probing the shifts of the pressure-dependent
ruby fluorescence peaks (see details in Supporting
Information).Structural development of gold nanoparticle arrays and
formation
of a quasi-single crystalline gold nanoparticle assembly under high-pressure
annealing. (a) HP-SAXS spectra integrated from SAXS patterns of nanoparticle
arrays collected during compression and release. (b) Ratio of intensities
of the Bragg peaks to that at ambient pressure (I/I0) upon increasing pressure. (c) Volume
ratio (V0/V) upon increasing
pressure. Black stars represent experimental data; red dashed line
represents a fit of Birch–Murnaghan EOS.[20]K0 is the bulk modulus, K′ is its pressure derivative (K′= dK0/dP), and V and V0 are the unit cell volumes at pressure and initial volume before
compression. Fitting the compression data gave K0 = 2.5 GPa and K′ = 17.6.During experiments, we raised the pressure gradually
to start the
compression process followed by releasing back to ambient pressure.
Each pressure data point was collected between 5 and 10 min. Synchrotron-based
HP-SAXS measurements were performed to monitor directly the in situ structural evolution. Representative HP-SAXS images
and integrated SAXS spectrum of the gold nanoparticle film collected
during compression and release course are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The SAXS images and
integrated patterns demonstrate that the nanoparticle assemblies gradually
evolve from a mixture of small clusters with fcc, hcp, and amorphous
phases into a quasi-single crystalline hcp structure. At ambient pressure,
the SAXS image shows that the sample has a polycrystalline phase and
consists of intermixing of small size of domains (or clusters) of
fcc, hcp, and disordered phases. As the pressure in the DAC increases,
the sample simultaneously experiences the deformation due to the compression.
At ambient pressure, the SAXS diffraction intensity is weak. No obvious
diffraction is visible outside the six symmetrical diffraction spots
at 2θ = 1.24°, which indicates the small size of the crystalline
domains or clusters. At 0.55 GPa, a new Debye–Scherrer diffraction
ring appears at 2θ = 1.46°, accompanied by significant
increase in diffraction intensity of all peaks (Figure 2a,b). The appearance of this diffraction signalizes the increase
of domain size in the film. When the pressure is increased to 1.84
GPa, a set of six spots starts to arise on this third Debye–Scherrer
ring. With continuous increase of pressure, the first diffraction
ring gradually fuses into the six-spotty texture, suggesting a large
hcp crystalline domain is growing at expense of others. This is also
reflected on the integrated SAXS pattern, where the shoulder peak
2 due to fcc {002} shrinks continuously (Figure 2). For pressure higher than 4.4 GPa, the SAXS pattern becomes all
single-crystal diffraction spots, which strongly suggests that the
sample has entirely transformed into a large single hcp domain with
[0001] orientation. The fact that the orientation of the diffraction
pattern matches perfectly with the diffraction spots observed at ambient
pressure (Figure 1a) is a strong evidence that
the final hcp single crystal structure grows from the initial hcp
domains (Figure S1). Figure 2b shows the relative intensity change of the first Bragg peak
as a function of pressure to that at ambient pressure. The significant
increase (>9 fold) of peak intensities (from ambient pressure to
0.93
GPa) indicates that application of pressure facilitates the growth
of the small domains of crystalline clusters and simultaneous reduction
of random nanoparticles in the gold film. Following that, the intensity
starts to decrease slightly with the further increase of pressure.
This may be affected by the reduced thickness of the sample under
compression. When the pressure was increased to around 4 GPa, the
intensity begins to increase again with the increase of pressure.
This increase of intensity comes from the highly ordered gold assemblies.
These experimental results clearly demonstrate that the high-pressure
field leads to significant improvement in structural quality of the
nanoparticle assembly. Fitting the compression data (Figure 2c) shows a bulk modulus close to those of organic
ligand matrix and polymer.[21]
Figure 1
Structural
evolution of gold nanoparticle arrays upon pressurization.
(a) A representative HP-SAXS image of gold nanoparticle arrays at
ambient pressure. (b) SAXS pattern integrated from image in (a). SAXS
patterns of the gold nanoparticle arrays during compression (c–g)
and release (h).
Figure 2
Structural development of gold nanoparticle arrays and
formation
of a quasi-single crystalline gold nanoparticle assembly under high-pressure
annealing. (a) HP-SAXS spectra integrated from SAXS patterns of nanoparticle
arrays collected during compression and release. (b) Ratio of intensities
of the Bragg peaks to that at ambient pressure (I/I0) upon increasing pressure. (c) Volume
ratio (V0/V) upon increasing
pressure. Black stars represent experimental data; red dashed line
represents a fit of Birch–Murnaghan EOS.[20]K0 is the bulk modulus, K′ is its pressure derivative (K′= dK0/dP), and V and V0 are the unit cell volumes at pressure and initial volume before
compression. Fitting the compression data gave K0 = 2.5 GPa and K′ = 17.6.
Schematic
Illustration for the Formation of Pressure-Induced Annealing
and Crystallization of Gold Nanoparticle Supercrystals
(a) At ambient pressure, nanoparticle
arrays with defects and randomly packed small clusters. (b) Upon increasing
pressure, defects are gradually removed and nanoparticle assemblies
start to re-arrange. Ordered crystal domains as a template lead to
growth of larger nanoparticle crystals. (c) Formation of single-crystalline
nanoparticle superlattices.The observed mechanical
annealing phenomena can be explained by
a pressure-driven close packing process of nanoparticles (Scheme 1). The starting self-assembled nanoparticle film
consists of structural defects including vacancy, random packed domains,
and grain boundaries and is thus not at a minimum energy state. The
external compression first eliminates the vacancy by structural shrinkage
that is evidenced by the significant volume shrinkage during compression
course (Figure 2c). The van der Waals interactions
from the soft interdigitating alkane chains provide essential/certain
mobility and allow local nanoparticles rearrangement under stress.
The applied stress breaks the original force balance within the nanoparticle
assembly and makes the nanoparticles prone to structural rearrangements.
Meanwhile, the applied pressure compresses the nanoparticle assembly
toward a new force-balanced, more close-packed configuration. During
this process, the crystalline domains will consume the random packed
smaller domains and grow larger, similar to the Ostward ripen mechanism.
As there is a large pre-existed [0001] oriented hcp domain in the
starting nanoparticle film, this domain serves as the initial structural
template and grows into a sample-wide, quasi-single crystalline structure.
Scheme 1
Schematic
Illustration for the Formation of Pressure-Induced Annealing
and Crystallization of Gold Nanoparticle Supercrystals
(a) At ambient pressure, nanoparticle
arrays with defects and randomly packed small clusters. (b) Upon increasing
pressure, defects are gradually removed and nanoparticle assemblies
start to re-arrange. Ordered crystal domains as a template lead to
growth of larger nanoparticle crystals. (c) Formation of single-crystalline
nanoparticle superlattices.
In summary, we observed the pressure-induced supercrystallization
of nanoparticle arrays. Under a continuous hydrostatic pressure up
to ∼6 GPa, randomly packed gold nanoparticle arrays gradually
transit to quasi-single crystalline hcp structure. HP-SAXS results
show that the deformation of nanoparticle assemblies under stress
rebalances interparticle forces within nanoparticle arrays and transforms
the nanoparticle film from an amorphous assembly with defects into
a quasi-single crystalline superstructure. Our mechanical annealing
study constitutes the first observation of room temperature, pressure-induced
grain growth in nanoparticle system, and provides a simple and efficient
way to improve the structural quality of nanoparticle assembly with
enhanced mechanical strength.
Authors: Hongyou Fan; Kai Yang; Daniel M Boye; Thomas Sigmon; Kevin J Malloy; Huifang Xu; Gabriel P López; C Jeffrey Brinker Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lingyao Meng; J Matthew D Lane; Luke Baca; Jackie Tafoya; Tommy Ao; Brian Stoltzfus; Marcus Knudson; Dane Morgan; Kevin Austin; Changyong Park; Paul Chow; Yuming Xiao; Ruipeng Li; Yang Qin; Hongyou Fan Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 15.419