Literature DB >> 2482886

Argiopine blocks glutamate-activated single-channel currents on crayfish muscle by two mechanisms.

S M Antonov1, J Dudel, C Franke, H Hatt.   

Abstract

1. The effect of the spider venom argiopine on L-glutamate-activated membrane channels of crayfish muscle was investigated using the patch-clamp technique. 2. When 10(-2) M-glutamate and 10(-9) M-argiopine were contained in the pipette solution of a cell-attached patch, bursts of openings of excitatory channels appeared after formation of the patch. These bursts ceased abruptly after variable periods of time in the range of 5 min. Higher concentrations of argiopine (up to 10(-6) M) blocked more rapidly, approximately in proportion to concentration. 3. The block of excitatory channels could be partially or completely reversed by hyperpolarizing the membrane by up to -190 mV from the resting potential. The time constant of the recovery of channel opening decreased with increasing hyperpolarization and was 2 ms with -160 mV hyperpolarization. Switching back from the hyperpolarized level to the resting potential, the time constant for the resulting block was about 3 s (10(-7) M-argiopine). Potential-dependent block by argiopine with similar characteristics was also observed in outside-out patches. 4. Up to argiopine concentrations of 10(-7) M the kinetics of channel openings and of bursts measured in pre-block periods or during reversal of the block by hyperpolarization were indistinguishable from controls. 5. When the potential-dependent block observed in the presence of 10(-6) M-argiopine and 10(-2) M-glutamate was reversed by hyperpolarization, additional short closings occurred during bursts. This 'flickering block' did not change burst length appreciably, but an additional open time component (tau = 0.1 ms) appeared and the average open time per burst was reduced. 6. At least two reaction steps seem necessary to model the behaviour of the potential-dependent block. The flickering block may be described as intermittent blocking of the channel which does not interfere with the reactions between glutamate and the channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2482886      PMCID: PMC1190022          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  26 in total

1.  Ion channel block by acetylcholine, carbachol and suberyldicholine at the frog neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  D C Ogden; D Colquhoun
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1985-09-23

2.  Single glutamate-gated synaptic channels at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. II. Dependence of channel open time on glutamate concentration.

Authors:  J Dudel; C Franke
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Liquid filament switch for ultra-fast exchanges of solutions at excised patches of synaptic membrane of crayfish muscle.

Authors:  C Franke; H Hatt; J Dudel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-06-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Spider toxins as tools for dissecting elements of excitatory amino acid transmission.

Authors:  H Jackson; P N Usherwood
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Single channel studies of non-competitive antagonism of a quisqualate-sensitive glutamate receptor by argiotoxin636--a fraction isolated from orb-web spider venom.

Authors:  C J Kerry; R L Ramsey; M S Sansom; P N Usherwood
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-09-06       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Slowly-reversible block of glutamate receptor-channels by venoms of the spiders, Argiope trifasciata and Araneus gemma.

Authors:  P N Usherwood; I R Duce; P Boden
Journal:  J Physiol (Paris)       Date:  1984

7.  Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.

Authors:  O P Hamill; A Marty; E Neher; B Sakmann; F J Sigworth
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Drug blockade of open end-plate channels.

Authors:  P R Adams
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate.

Authors:  D Colquhoun; B Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Blockade of synaptic transmission in the squid giant synapse by a spider toxin (JSTX).

Authors:  N Kawai; S Yamagishi; M Saito; K Furuya
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-11-14       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  6 in total

1.  An analysis of philanthotoxin block for recombinant rat GluR6(Q) glutamate receptor channels.

Authors:  R Bähring; M L Mayer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The action of philanthotoxin-343 and photolabile analogues on locust (Schistocerca gregaria) muscle.

Authors:  H L Sudan; C J Kerry; I R Mellor; S K Choi; D Huang; K Nakanishi; P N Usherwood
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  1995

3.  Block of open channels of recombinant AMPA receptors and native AMPA/kainate receptors by adamantane derivatives.

Authors:  L G Magazanik; S L Buldakova; M V Samoilova; V E Gmiro; I R Mellor; P N Usherwood
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Different types of glutamate receptors in isolated and identified neurones of the mollusc Planorbarius corneus.

Authors:  S A Gapon; L G Magazanik
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Kainate-induced calcium overload of cortical neurons in vitro: Dependence on expression of AMPAR GluA2-subunit and down-regulation by subnanomolar ouabain.

Authors:  Polina A Abushik; Dmitry A Sibarov; Misty J Eaton; Serguei N Skatchkov; Sergei M Antonov
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 6.817

6.  Dual action of amitriptyline on NMDA receptors: enhancement of Ca-dependent desensitization and trapping channel block.

Authors:  Yulia D Stepanenko; Sergei I Boikov; Dmitry A Sibarov; Polina A Abushik; Nina P Vanchakova; Daria Belinskaia; Natalia N Shestakova; Sergei M Antonov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.