Literature DB >> 24828559

The risk of radiation-induced second cancers in the high to medium dose region: a comparison between passive and scanned proton therapy, IMRT and VMAT for pediatric patients with brain tumors.

Maryam Moteabbed1, Torunn I Yock, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

The incidence of second malignant tumors is a clinically observed adverse late effect of radiation therapy, especially in organs close to the treatment site, receiving medium to high doses (>2.5 Gy). For pediatric patients, choosing the least toxic radiation modality is of utmost importance, due to their high radiosensitivity and small size. This study aims to evaluate the risk of second cancer incidence in the vicinity of the primary radiation field, for pediatric patients with brain/head and neck tumors and compare four treatment modalities: passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PPT and PBS), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For a cohort of six pediatric patients originally treated with PPT, additional PBS, IMRT and VMAT plans were created. Dose distributions from these plans were used to calculate the excess absolute risk (EAR) and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for developing a second tumor in soft tissue and skull. A widely used risk assessment formalism was employed and compared with a linear model based on recent clinical findings. In general, LAR was found to range between 0.01%-2.8% for PPT/PBS and 0.04%-4.9% for IMRT/VMAT. PBS was associated with the lowest risk for most patients using carcinoma and sarcoma models, whereas IMRT and VMAT risks were comparable and the highest among all modalities. The LAR for IMRT/VMAT relative to PPT ranged from 1.3-4.6 for soft tissue and from 3.5-9.5 for skull. Larger absolute LAR was observed for younger patients and using linear risk models. The number of fields used in proton therapy and IMRT had minimal effect on the risk. When planning treatments and deciding on the treatment modality, the probability of second cancer incidence should be carefully examined and weighed against the possibility of developing acute side effects for each patient individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24828559     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/12/2883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Assessment of uncertainties in radiation-induced cancer risk predictions at clinically relevant doses.

Authors:  J Nguyen; M Moteabbed; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Modeling age-dependent radiation-induced second cancer risks and estimation of mutation rate: an evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Kamran Kaveh; Venkata S K Manem; Mohammad Kohandel; Siv Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Detecting Anastasis In Vivo by CaspaseTracker Biosensor.

Authors:  Ho Man Tang; Ming Chiu Fung; Ho Lam Tang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; John G Eley; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Proton therapy for paediatric CNS tumours - improving treatment-related outcomes.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Torunn I Yock; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  MRI-Based Proton Treatment Planning for Base of Skull Tumors.

Authors:  Ghazal Shafai-Erfani; Yang Lei; Yingzi Liu; Yinan Wang; Tonghe Wang; Jim Zhong; Tian Liu; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Jun Zhou; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Mei Chen; Pablo Yepes; Yoshifumi Hojo; Falk Poenisch; Yupeng Li; Jiayi Chen; Cheng Xu; Xiaodong He; G Brandon Gunn; Steven J Frank; Narayan Sahoo; Heng Li; Xiaorong Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Risk of radiation-induced second malignant neoplasms from photon and proton radiotherapy in paediatric abdominal neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Sophie Taylor; Pei Lim; Reem Ahmad; Ammar Alhadi; William Harris; Vasilis Rompokos; Derek D'Souza; Mark Gaze; Jennifer Gains; Catarina Veiga
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Secondary cancer risk from modern external-beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients: Impact of fractionation and dose distribution.

Authors:  Chomporn Sitathanee; Puangpen Tangboonduangjit; Mantana Dhanachai; Sawanee Suntiwong; Pornpan Yongvithisatid; Sukanya Rutchantuk; Pimolpun Changkaew; Rattana Watjiranon; Suphalak Khachonkham; Vipa Boonkitticharoen
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.