Literature DB >> 24828110

Differences in cytogenetic sensitivity to ionizing radiation in newborns and adults.

Marina V Bakhmutsky1, Michael C Joiner, Theodore B Jones, James D Tucker.   

Abstract

Radiation exposure causes DNA breaks leading to structural chromosome aberrations that can be carcinogenic. Lifetime cancer risks are elevated in irradiated children compared to similarly exposed adults. To determine the extent to which age influences the frequency and types of chromosome damage in response to ionizing radiation, peripheral blood samples were collected from 20 adults (aged 22-78 years) and from the umbilical cords of 10 newborns and acutely exposed to 0 (control), 1, 2, 3 or 4 Gy of cobalt-60 gamma rays. Cells were cultured in the presence of the mitogen phytohemagglutinin, harvested at 48 h and then evaluated for structural chromosome aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization whole chromosome painting. Regression analyses were used to evaluate radiation-induced translocated chromosomes, dicentrics, acentric fragments, color junctions and aberrant cells to determine whether the frequencies of these events was dependent upon age. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from newborns showed statistically significant increases in the induced frequencies of translocated chromosomes, dicentrics, acentric fragments, color junctions and abnormal cells at several radiation doses when compared to blood from adults. No significant changes in sensitivity with age were observed when adults were evaluated separately. We conclude that peripheral lymphocytes from newborns are significantly more prone to radiation-induced chromosome aberrations than peripheral lymphocytes from adults. The increased sensitivity of newborns in this study relative to adults was found to be 37(±9)%, 18(±4)%, 12(±2)% and 4(±5)% at doses of 1, 2, 3 and 4 Gy, respectively. These data may be relevant when making radiation exposure risk assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24828110     DOI: 10.1667/RR13598.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  4 in total

Review 1.  Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Niels Belmans; Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Bjorn Baselet; Kevin Tabury; Stéphane Lucas; Ivo Lambrichts; Marjan Moreels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Use of the bolus tracking technique for the tomographic evaluation of the uretero-vesicular junction in dogs and assessment of dose records.

Authors:  Maurizio Longo; Maria Elena Andreis; Cinzia Pettinato; Giuliano Ravasio; Vanessa Rabbogliatti; Donatella De Zani; Mauro Di Giancamillo; Davide Danilo Zani
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Rate of individuals with clearly increased radiosensitivity rise with age both in healthy individuals and in cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara Schuster; Anna Ellmann; Theresa Mayo; Judith Auer; Matthias Haas; Markus Hecht; Rainer Fietkau; Luitpold V Distel
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  High susceptibility of mouse newborns to delayed appearance of DNA double-strand breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kenta Sakaguchi; Kazunori Shiraishi; Seiji Kodama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.