Literature DB >> 24827647

Migration of intrauterine devices with radiological findings: report on two cases.

Hediye Pinar Gunbey1, Asli Tanrivermis Sayit2, Ilkay Sedakat Idilman3, Onur Aksoy4.   

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most reliable and cheapest contraception methods. Our aims are to evaluate misplaced IUDs with radiological findings and to emphasise the importance of radiological imaging. We report two cases with radiological findings, one of complete migration to the abdomen without colonic perforation and one of partial migration to the bladder lumen with pregnancy. Uterine perforation and migration of IUDs are rare and undesirable complications. Suspected intra-abdominal IUDs can be evaluated with CT for precise localisation and possible complications without pregnancy. 2014 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24827647      PMCID: PMC4024539          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  10 in total

Review 1.  [The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature].

Authors:  B Kassab; P Audra
Journal:  Contracept Fertil Sex       Date:  1999-10

2.  Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  L Miranda; A Settembre; P Capasso; D Cuccurullo; D Pisaniello; F Corcione
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Bladder calculus resulting from the migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Eric J Hick; Javier Hernández; Raul Yordán; Allen F Morey; Ricardo Avilés; Carlos R García
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Ayse Ender Yumru; Ebru Inci Coskun; Banu Ondes
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  Bladder perforation related to intrauterine device.

Authors:  Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Emel Ebru Ozcimen; Bulent Ozturk; Ayla Uckuyu; Tufan Cicek; Murat Gonen
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.743

6.  Pelvic mass due to transmigrated IUD.

Authors:  Nadereh Behtash; Setareh Akhavan; Sara Mokhtar
Journal:  Acta Med Iran       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care.

Authors:  Hillary E Boortz; Daniel J A Margolis; Nagesh Ragavendra; Maitraya K Patel; Barbara M Kadell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Removal of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices by laparoscopy.

Authors:  O Balci; M Capar; A S Mahmoud; M C Colakoglu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case report.

Authors:  U S Nceboz; H T Ozçakir; Y Uyar; H Cağlar
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval.

Authors:  Eric M Heinberg; Travis W McCoy; Resad Pasic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Retained Intrauterine Device (IUD): Triple Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mon-Lai Cheung; Shadi Rezai; Janelle M Jackman; Neil D Patel; Basem Z Bernaba; Omid Hakimian; Dilfuza Nuritdinova; Catherine L Turley; Ray Mercado; Takeko Takeshige; Sudha M Reddy; Paul N Fuller; Cassandra E Henderson
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.