Literature DB >> 24827525

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion compared with digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of extradural spinal metastases: a pilot study.

Jan C Mazura1, Sasan Karimi, Mohan Pauliah, Mohammad Amin Banihashemi, Y Pierre Gobin, Mark H Bilsky, Athos Patsalides.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study comparing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) perfusion with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in determining the vascularity of spinal tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To report on the efficacy of DCE-MR perfusion as a potential noninvasive surrogate for measuring vascularity and thus determine the need for preoperative embolization. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although primary spinal tumors are rare, spine metastases are relatively common and symptomatic in approximately 14% of patients. Symptomatic patients require palliation with radiotherapy and/or surgery, with possible preoperative endovascular embolization of the tumor.
METHODS: A retrospective review revealed 10 patients with 11 diseased vertebral bodies who had received spine DCE-MR perfusion studies and subsequently underwent spinal DSA. Processed MR data were used to calculate a blood flow ratio comparing blood flow with a diseased and an adjacent normal vertebral body. Spinal tumor vascularity was graded on the basis of angiographic tumor blush from 0 (decreased enhancement compared with a normal vertebral body) to 4 (marked tumor blush with early arteriovenous shunting).
RESULTS: Eight vertebral bodies demonstrated increased vascularity on DSA with blood flow ratios of greater than 1.8, 2 vertebral bodies demonstrated normal enhancement on DSA with cerebral blood flow (CBF) ratio of 0.55 to 1.14, and 1 vertebral body level had decreased enhancement on DSA, with a CBF ratio of 0.43. There was a strong correlation between CBF ratio and DSA score, with Spearman ρ = 0.87 (P = 0.00012).
CONCLUSION: These data show a statistically significant correlation between CBF ratio and DSA and suggest that DCE-MR perfusion can serve as a surrogate to DSA for determining tumor vascularity in patients with extramedullary spinal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24827525     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Assessing Vascularity of Osseous Spinal Metastases with Dual-Energy CT-DSA: A Pilot Study Compared with Catheter Angiography.

Authors:  Y-C Huang; F-Y Tsuang; C-W Lee; C-Y Wu; Y-H Lin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up.

Authors:  Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Peter C Gerszten; Sten Myrehaug; Nina A Mayr; William Tc Yuh; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Arjun Sahgal; Simon S Lo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of spinal tumor vascularity: correlation with angiography.

Authors:  Xiao-Xi Meng; Yong-Qiu Zhang; Hua-Qiang Liao; Hong-Chao Liu; Hai-Lin Jiang; Shu-Jun Ke; Wei-Hua Dong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques of the spine and spinal cord in children and adults.

Authors:  M I Vargas; B M A Delattre; J Boto; J Gariani; A Dhouib; A Fitsiori; J L Dietemann
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.