Literature DB >> 24827518

Changing trends in cervical spine fusions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Benjamin E Stein1, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Amit Jain, Mesfin A Lemma, David B Cohen, Khaled M Kebaish.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the trends in primary cervical spine fusion procedures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) against those in the general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: RA severely impacts multiple joints in the body and can result in substantial deformity and functional impairment. Cervical spine involvement is common. In the past decade, treatment for RA has changed substantially with the introduction of biologically based, disease-modifying antirheumatic medications. Recent literature has shown decreasing rates of total joint arthroplasty in patients with RA.
METHODS: Cases of cervical spine fusion in the general population and in patients with RA were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1992 through 2008. US population counts were obtained from the Census Bureau. Data were analyzed with computer software (significance, P < 0.05 for all analyses). Linear regression models were used to describe national rates of cervical spine fusion in patients with and without RA.
RESULTS: There was a marked increase in the number of cervical fusion procedures in the studied population. Over time, the incidence of atlantoaxial fusion increased in the general population (P < 0.01) and decreased in patients with RA (P < 0.01). Compared with the general population, patients with RA had a significantly lower rate of increase in the incidence of posterior cervical fusion (P < 0.01) and a significantly higher rate of increase in the incidence of anterior cervical fusion (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In the US, the absolute number of primary cervical fusion procedures from 1992 through 2008 increased in the general population and in patients with RA. However, the patients with RA had a significantly lower incidence of undergoing atlantoaxial and posterior cervical surgical procedures than did the general population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24827518     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Rheumatoid instability in the cervical spine : Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  R Kothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis : Diagnostics and treatment of instability due to rheumatism].

Authors:  I Janssen; E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Guillaume Baucher; Jelena Taskovic; Lucas Troude; Granit Molliqaj; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide registry-based study with patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Siril T Holmberg; Agnete M Gulati; Tonje Okkenhaug Johansen; Øyvind O Salvesen; Vetle Vangen Lønne; Tore K Solberg; Erling A Tronvik; Øystein P Nygaard; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Surgical Management of the Lumbar Spine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Peter Joo; Laurence Ge; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Nicolas R Thompson; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  The impact of steroids, methotrexate, and biologics on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing fusions at the craniovertebral junction.

Authors:  Ryan Khanna; Brian J Dlouhy; Zachary A Smith; Sandi K Lam; Tyler R Koski; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Does stopping at C7 in long posterior cervical fusion accelerate the symptomatic breakdown of cervicothoracic junction?

Authors:  Dong-Ho Lee; Jae Hwan Cho; Jin Il Jung; Jong-Min Baik; Deuk Soo Jun; Chang Ju Hwang; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in Finland, 1999-2015.

Authors:  Anna Kotkansalo; Ville Leinonen; Merja Korajoki; Jyrki Salmenkivi; Katariina Korhonen; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Cervical Myelopathy in Patients Suffering from Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Case Series of 9 Patients and A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Insa Janssen; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.