J Balmaña1, N M Tung2, S J Isakoff3, B Graña4, P D Ryan3, C Saura4, E S Lowe5, P Frewer6, E Winer7, J Baselga8, J E Garber7. 1. University Hospital Vall d'Hebron and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain jbalmana@vhio.net. 2. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston. 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 4. University Hospital Vall d'Hebron and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. 5. AstraZeneca, Wilmington, USA. 6. AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK. 7. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston. 8. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To establish the maximum tolerated dose, determine safety/tolerability and evaluate the pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of olaparib in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced solid tumors, who had progressed on standard treatment, were assigned to a treatment cohort and received oral olaparib [50-200 mg twice daily (bid); 21-day cycle] continuously or intermittently (days 1-5 or 1-10) in combination with cisplatin (60-75 mg/m(2) intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 neutropenia (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with continuous olaparib 100 mg bid or 200 mg bid; n = 1 each) and grade 3 lipase elevation (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with olaparib 100 mg bid days 1-10 or 50 mg bid days 1-5; n = 1 each) were reported. Olaparib and cisplatin doses were subsequently reduced to 50 mg bid days 1-5 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively; no DLTs were reported for patients receiving this regimen. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7%), anemia (9.3%) and leucopenia (9.3%). Thirty patients (55.6%) received colony-stimulating factors for hematologic support. The overall objective response rate was 41% for patients with measurable disease, and 43% and 71% among patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation who had ovarian and breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) was not considered tolerable; intermittent olaparib (50 mg bid, days 1-5) with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) improved tolerability. Promising antitumor activity in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations was observed and warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND: To establish the maximum tolerated dose, determine safety/tolerability and evaluate the pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of olaparib in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced solid tumors, who had progressed on standard treatment, were assigned to a treatment cohort and received oral olaparib [50-200 mg twice daily (bid); 21-day cycle] continuously or intermittently (days 1-5 or 1-10) in combination with cisplatin (60-75 mg/m(2) intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 neutropenia (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with continuous olaparib 100 mg bid or 200 mg bid; n = 1 each) and grade 3 lipase elevation (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with olaparib 100 mg bid days 1-10 or 50 mg bid days 1-5; n = 1 each) were reported. Olaparib and cisplatin doses were subsequently reduced to 50 mg bid days 1-5 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively; no DLTs were reported for patients receiving this regimen. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7%), anemia (9.3%) and leucopenia (9.3%). Thirty patients (55.6%) received colony-stimulating factors for hematologic support. The overall objective response rate was 41% for patients with measurable disease, and 43% and 71% among patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation who had ovarian and breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Olaparib in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) was not considered tolerable; intermittent olaparib (50 mg bid, days 1-5) with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) improved tolerability. Promising antitumor activity in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations was observed and warrants further investigation.
Authors: Narjust Duma; Kelly C Gast; Grace M Choong; Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Ciara C O'Sullivan Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: J Mateo; V Moreno; A Gupta; S B Kaye; E Dean; M R Middleton; M Friedlander; C Gourley; R Plummer; G Rustin; C Sessa; K Leunen; J Ledermann; H Swaisland; A Fielding; W Bannister; S Nicum; L R Molife Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Cody J Peer; Jung-Min Lee; Jeffrey Roth; Louis Rodgers; Jeffers Nguyen; Christina M Annunziata; Lori Minasian; Elise C Kohn; William D Figg Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Anne L van de Ven; Shifalika Tangutoori; Paige Baldwin; Ju Qiao; Codi Gharagouzloo; Nina Seitzer; John G Clohessy; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Robert Cormack; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Srinivas Sridhar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Shawn F Johnson; Cristina Cruz; Ann Katrin Greifenberg; Sofia Dust; Daniel G Stover; David Chi; Benjamin Primack; Shiliang Cao; Andrea J Bernhardy; Rhiannon Coulson; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Bose Kochupurakkal; Heather Sun; Christine Unitt; Lisa A Moreau; Kristopher A Sarosiek; Maurizio Scaltriti; Dejan Juric; José Baselga; Andrea L Richardson; Scott J Rodig; Alan D D'Andrea; Judith Balmaña; Neil Johnson; Matthias Geyer; Violeta Serra; Elgene Lim; Geoffrey I Shapiro Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Jung-Min Lee; Cody J Peer; Minshu Yu; Lauren Amable; Nicolas Gordon; Christina M Annunziata; Nicole Houston; Andrew K L Goey; Tristan M Sissung; Bernard Parker; Lori Minasian; Victoria L Chiou; Robert F Murphy; Brigitte C Widemann; William D Figg; Elise C Kohn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 12.531