Literature DB >> 24826182

1-Hy-droxy-isoquinolin-2-ium hydrogen succinate.

S Ambalatharasu1, A Sankar1, G Peramaiyan1, G Chakkaravarthi2, R Kanagadurai1.   

Abstract

In the title salt, C9H8NO(+)·C4H5O4 (-), the isoquinolinium ring system is approximately planar [r.m.s deviation = 0.011 (2) Å]. In the crystal, adjacent cations and anions are linked by O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming columns along the b axis. The columns are connected by weak C-H⋯O inter-actions into a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24826182      PMCID: PMC3998545          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814006485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of quinoline derivatives, see: Hopkins et al. (2005 ▶); Musiol et al. (2006 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶). For a related quinoline structure, see: Loh et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H8NOC4H5O4 M = 263.24 Monoclinic, a = 9.553 (5) Å b = 4.962 (3) Å c = 12.706 (5) Å β = 104.117 (5)° V = 584.1 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.22 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.975, T max = 0.982 8297 measured reflections 3688 independent reflections 3289 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.053 wR(F 2) = 0.169 S = 1.10 3688 reflections 181 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.57 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814006485/is5349sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814006485/is5349Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814006485/is5349Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 993415 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H8NO+·C4H5O4F(000) = 276
Mr = 263.24Dx = 1.497 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 4664 reflections
a = 9.553 (5) Åθ = 2.2–32.6°
b = 4.962 (3) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 12.706 (5) ÅT = 295 K
β = 104.117 (5)°Block, colourless
V = 584.1 (5) Å30.22 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
Z = 2
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer3688 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3289 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.028
ω and φ scanθmax = 33.2°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −13→14
Tmin = 0.975, Tmax = 0.982k = −6→7
8297 measured reflectionsl = −19→19
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.169H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1138P)2 + 0.0584P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3688 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
181 parametersΔρmax = 0.57 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = −0.55 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.28708 (17)1.0029 (4)0.15427 (13)0.0248 (3)
C20.21024 (18)1.0069 (4)0.04383 (12)0.0268 (3)
C30.3651 (2)0.6470 (5)0.01057 (17)0.0378 (4)
H30.39010.5288−0.03870.045*
C40.4391 (2)0.6380 (4)0.11717 (17)0.0345 (4)
H40.51350.51460.14040.041*
C50.40134 (18)0.8183 (4)0.19153 (14)0.0273 (3)
C60.4726 (2)0.8221 (5)0.30338 (15)0.0352 (4)
H60.54920.70520.33000.042*
C70.4292 (2)0.9972 (5)0.37231 (14)0.0381 (4)
H70.47490.99780.44590.046*
C80.3161 (2)1.1745 (5)0.33147 (14)0.0342 (4)
H80.28701.29420.37830.041*
C90.24902 (16)1.1760 (3)0.22686 (11)0.0219 (3)
H90.17421.29770.20210.026*
C10−0.2126 (2)1.2254 (4)0.36224 (13)0.0294 (4)
C11−0.1045 (2)0.9998 (5)0.37431 (13)0.0337 (4)
H11A−0.13560.85290.41360.040*
H11B−0.01221.06330.41740.040*
C12−0.0841 (2)0.8927 (4)0.26675 (13)0.0303 (3)
H12A−0.17600.82510.22460.036*
H12B−0.05591.04100.22660.036*
C130.02711 (18)0.6711 (4)0.27745 (12)0.0258 (3)
N10.2522 (2)0.8310 (5)−0.02600 (14)0.0423 (4)
H10.214 (3)0.848 (9)−0.0992 (9)0.063*
O10.10057 (16)1.1826 (3)0.01569 (11)0.0364 (3)
H1A0.067 (3)1.149 (7)−0.0474 (11)0.055*
O2−0.23278 (17)1.3291 (4)0.45355 (11)0.0410 (4)
H2A−0.198 (3)1.257 (7)0.5134 (15)0.061*
O3−0.27879 (19)1.3135 (5)0.27647 (12)0.0492 (5)
O40.04477 (15)0.5692 (3)0.19024 (9)0.0332 (3)
O50.09610 (18)0.5944 (4)0.36893 (10)0.0425 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0245 (7)0.0250 (7)0.0242 (6)−0.0023 (6)0.0042 (5)0.0003 (6)
C20.0285 (8)0.0263 (8)0.0234 (6)−0.0023 (7)0.0023 (5)−0.0009 (6)
C30.0405 (10)0.0367 (10)0.0375 (9)0.0019 (8)0.0118 (7)−0.0097 (8)
C40.0335 (8)0.0329 (10)0.0371 (9)0.0060 (7)0.0088 (7)0.0011 (7)
C50.0259 (7)0.0275 (8)0.0284 (6)−0.0007 (7)0.0064 (6)0.0019 (6)
C60.0308 (8)0.0414 (11)0.0305 (7)0.0065 (8)0.0015 (6)0.0067 (7)
C70.0390 (10)0.0474 (12)0.0246 (7)0.0031 (9)0.0010 (6)0.0000 (8)
C80.0363 (9)0.0406 (10)0.0244 (7)0.0025 (8)0.0048 (6)−0.0041 (7)
C90.0215 (6)0.0236 (7)0.0190 (5)0.0008 (6)0.0022 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C100.0318 (8)0.0310 (9)0.0251 (6)0.0048 (7)0.0065 (6)0.0020 (6)
C110.0425 (10)0.0346 (9)0.0219 (6)0.0133 (8)0.0038 (6)0.0019 (6)
C120.0359 (9)0.0322 (9)0.0215 (6)0.0067 (7)0.0047 (6)0.0013 (6)
C130.0290 (7)0.0249 (8)0.0220 (6)0.0003 (6)0.0036 (5)−0.0006 (5)
N10.0468 (10)0.0450 (11)0.0331 (7)−0.0002 (9)0.0058 (7)−0.0062 (8)
O10.0384 (7)0.0378 (8)0.0273 (6)0.0087 (6)−0.0031 (5)−0.0047 (5)
O20.0439 (8)0.0501 (9)0.0283 (6)0.0138 (7)0.0077 (5)−0.0033 (6)
O30.0540 (9)0.0608 (12)0.0310 (6)0.0270 (9)0.0069 (6)0.0116 (7)
O40.0389 (7)0.0384 (8)0.0205 (5)0.0064 (6)0.0036 (4)−0.0035 (5)
O50.0549 (9)0.0469 (9)0.0213 (5)0.0213 (8)0.0010 (5)−0.0017 (5)
C1—C91.373 (2)C8—H80.9300
C1—C51.415 (2)C9—H90.9300
C1—C21.416 (2)C10—O31.201 (2)
C2—O11.343 (2)C10—O21.325 (2)
C2—N11.372 (2)C10—C111.506 (3)
C3—C41.367 (3)C11—C121.522 (2)
C3—N11.403 (3)C11—H11A0.9700
C3—H30.9300C11—H11B0.9700
C4—C51.410 (3)C12—C131.512 (3)
C4—H40.9300C12—H12A0.9700
C5—C61.418 (2)C12—H12B0.9700
C6—C71.368 (3)C13—O51.248 (2)
C6—H60.9300C13—O41.266 (2)
C7—C81.392 (3)N1—H10.917 (10)
C7—H70.9300O1—H1A0.806 (10)
C8—C91.327 (2)O2—H2A0.833 (10)
C9—C1—C5119.31 (14)C8—C9—H9119.1
C9—C1—C2119.92 (15)C1—C9—H9119.1
C5—C1—C2120.77 (15)O3—C10—O2119.75 (18)
O1—C2—N1124.95 (15)O3—C10—C11124.01 (17)
O1—C2—C1117.06 (15)O2—C10—C11116.24 (15)
N1—C2—C1117.98 (16)C10—C11—C12113.75 (14)
C4—C3—N1121.27 (18)C10—C11—H11A108.8
C4—C3—H3119.4C12—C11—H11A108.8
N1—C3—H3119.4C10—C11—H11B108.8
C3—C4—C5119.22 (18)C12—C11—H11B108.8
C3—C4—H4120.4H11A—C11—H11B107.7
C5—C4—H4120.4C13—C12—C11114.45 (14)
C4—C5—C1119.27 (16)C13—C12—H12A108.6
C4—C5—C6122.75 (18)C11—C12—H12A108.6
C1—C5—C6117.98 (16)C13—C12—H12B108.6
C7—C6—C5120.24 (18)C11—C12—H12B108.6
C7—C6—H6119.9H12A—C12—H12B107.6
C5—C6—H6119.9O5—C13—O4122.73 (17)
C6—C7—C8119.46 (16)O5—C13—C12120.36 (14)
C6—C7—H7120.3O4—C13—C12116.91 (14)
C8—C7—H7120.3C2—N1—C3121.47 (16)
C9—C8—C7121.22 (18)C2—N1—H1119 (3)
C9—C8—H8119.4C3—N1—H1119 (2)
C7—C8—H8119.4C2—O1—H1A103 (2)
C8—C9—C1121.79 (17)C10—O2—H2A122 (2)
C9—C1—C2—O1−0.7 (2)C5—C6—C7—C8−1.0 (3)
C5—C1—C2—O1178.07 (16)C6—C7—C8—C90.3 (3)
C9—C1—C2—N1179.79 (17)C7—C8—C9—C10.3 (3)
C5—C1—C2—N1−1.5 (3)C5—C1—C9—C8−0.3 (3)
N1—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (3)C2—C1—C9—C8178.46 (18)
C3—C4—C5—C10.4 (3)O3—C10—C11—C120.7 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6179.99 (19)O2—C10—C11—C12−178.94 (18)
C9—C1—C5—C4179.17 (17)C10—C11—C12—C13178.42 (17)
C2—C1—C5—C40.4 (3)C11—C12—C13—O5−1.7 (3)
C9—C1—C5—C6−0.4 (2)C11—C12—C13—O4177.79 (17)
C2—C1—C5—C6−179.14 (17)O1—C2—N1—C3−177.81 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C7−178.5 (2)C1—C2—N1—C31.7 (3)
C1—C5—C6—C71.1 (3)C4—C3—N1—C2−0.9 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O3i0.92 (1)2.48 (2)3.255 (3)142 (3)
O1—H1A···O4ii0.81 (1)1.91 (1)2.705 (2)170 (3)
O2—H2A···O5iii0.83 (1)1.77 (1)2.591 (2)169 (3)
C4—H4···O3iv0.932.503.360 (3)154
C8—H8···O5v0.932.343.078 (3)137
C9—H9···O4v0.931.812.718 (2)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O3i 0.92 (1)2.48 (2)3.255 (3)142 (3)
O1—H1A⋯O4ii 0.81 (1)1.91 (1)2.705 (2)170 (3)
O2—H2A⋯O5iii 0.83 (1)1.77 (1)2.591 (2)169 (3)
C4—H4⋯O3iv 0.932.503.360 (3)154
C8—H8⋯O5v 0.932.343.078 (3)137
C9—H9⋯O4v 0.931.812.718 (2)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 2.  Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: recent developments.

Authors:  Katie L Hopkins; Robert H Davies; E John Threlfall
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Antifungal properties of new series of quinoline derivatives.

Authors:  Robert Musiol; Josef Jampilek; Vladimir Buchta; Luis Silva; Halina Niedbala; Barbara Podeszwa; Anna Palka; Katarzyna Majerz-Maniecka; Barbara Oleksyn; Jaroslaw Polanski
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  2-Cyano-quinolin-1-ium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-02

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structure of 2-phenyl-ethanaminium 3-carb-oxy-prop-2-enoate.

Authors:  N Swarna Sowmya; S Sampathkrishnan; R Akilan; G Chakkaravarthi; R Mohan Kumar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-08-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.