| Literature DB >> 24825950 |
Efrosini Z Papadaki1, Panagiotis G Simos2, Vasileios C Mastorodemos3, Theodora Panou3, Thomas G Maris4, Apostolos H Karantanas5, Andreas Plaitakis3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) demonstrate brain hemodynamic changes and also suffer from difficulties in processing speed, memory, and executive functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24825950 PMCID: PMC4006593 DOI: 10.1155/2014/252419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurol ISSN: 0953-4180 Impact factor: 3.342
Clinical, demographic, and neuropsychological information on the patients and healthy controls when appropriate (mean ± SD and range in parentheses).
| CIS ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender: | ||
| Men | 14 | 25 |
| Women | 16 | 18 |
| Handedness: | ||
| Right | 27 | 37 |
| Left | 3 | 6 |
| First symptom: | ||
| Optic neuritis | 6 | — |
| Brainstem-cerebellar | 11 | |
| Spinal | 1 | |
| Sensorimotor | 6 | |
| Polysymptomatic | 6 | |
| Age (years) | 31.4 ± 9.6 | 33.6 ± 10.2 |
| Education (years) | 13.6 ± 2.6 | 14.4 ± 3.2 |
| Illness duration (years) | 1.5 ± 1.5 | — |
| EDSS | 1.0 ± .5 | — |
| WASI Vocabulary (z) | .80 ± 1.0 | .35 ± 0.9 |
| WASI Matrices (z) | −.25 ± .9 | −.08 ± .8 |
| CESD | 13.0 ± 12.7 | — |
| STAI-B (Trait Anxiety) | 44.2 ± 10.6 | — |
| Fatigue | 29.7 ± 11.2 | — |
EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; CESD: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; STAI-A: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y; Fatigue: Fatigue Severity Scale; WASI: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Standard (z) scores on neuropsychological tests.
Descriptive statistics for motor-executive task performance.
| CIS ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | |
| Visuomotor learning task | ||
| Simple trials-RT (ms)** | 744 ± 264 | 599 ± 137 |
| Inhibition trials-RT (ms)** | 960 ± 254 | 842 ± 205 |
| Simple trials-% errors | 2.4 ± 3.5 | 3.1 ± 4.4 |
| Inhibition trials-% errors | 6.0 ± 5.6 | 6.4 ± 6.2 |
| Complex Decision task | ||
| Simple trials-RT (ms) | 676 ± 146 | 668 ± 214 |
| Set shifting trials-RT (ms)** | 917 ± 241 | 763 ± 255 |
| Simple trials-% errors | 15.2 ± 9.3 | 15.9 ± 9.2 |
| Set shifting trials-% errors | 12.4 ± 8.6 | 13.7 ± 9.0 |
Group differences: *P < .01, **P < .001. Raw data for comparison are presented here from a subgroup of 43 controls chosen from the normative sample, matched on gender, age, education, FSIQ, and place of residence (urban versus rural) to the group of CIS patients.
Figure 1Correlation between performance accuracy and RT during the visuomotor learning task and CBV/CBF values for CIS patients. Zero-order Pearson correlation coefficients between performance accuracy (a) and RT (b) during the visuomotor learning task and CBF/CBV in 20 ROIs in the left (L) and right (R) hemispheres and the corpus callosum. Coefficients > 0.50 were significant at a Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of .0025 (indicated by horizontal solid lines). Asterisks indicate significant correlations which were also found to be condition specific (based on Fisher's z test for the difference between correlation coefficients in the “simple” and “executive” conditions).
Correlation differences between simple and inhibition trials and between simple and setshifting trials in the visuomotor and Complex Decision tasks, respectively.
| Visuomotor learning task error rate RT | Complex Decision task error rate RT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBV | CBF | CBV | CBF | CBV | CBF | CBV | CBF | |
| Frontal-R | −.34 | −.01 | −.29 | −.30 | −.39 | −.29 | −.36 | −.30 |
| Frontal-L | −.34 | −.06 | −.04 | −.05 | −.24 | −.51 | −.47 | −.44 |
| Parietal-R | −.31 | −.01 | −.14 | −.14 | −.12 | −.22 | −.31 | −.46 |
| Parietal-L | −.21 | −.07 | −.16 | −.10 | −.13 | −.44 | −.47 | −.54∗ |
| Temporal-R | −.11 | .03 | −.19 | −.18 | −.03 | −.43 | −.25 | −.34 |
| Temporal-L | −.18 | −.07 | −.29 | −.31 | −.25 | −.44 | −.05 | −.01 |
| Occipital-R | −.60* | −.40 | .21 | .29 | −.21 | −.33 | −.29 | −.47 |
| Occipital-L | −.61* | −.44 | .22 | .23 | −.34 | −.26 | −.50 | −.67 |
| Thalamus-R | −.53* | −.08 | −.06 | −.14 | −.39 | −.76** | −.35 | −.39 |
| Thalamus-L | −.64* | −.05 | −.10 | −.10 | −.35 | −.70** | −.37 | −.34 |
| Caudate-R | −.43 | −.24 | −.05 | −.13 | −.18 | −.28 | −.58 | −.55* |
| Caudate-L | −.33 | .06 | −.11 | −.12 | −.23 | −.60 | −.52 | −.40 |
| Lenticular-R | −.44 | .03 | −.07 | .01 | −.36 | −.18 | −.18 | −.22 |
| Lenticular-L | −.41 | −.31 | −.02 | −.04 | −.37 | −.31 | −.03 | −.12 |
| Periventricular-R | −.53* | .01 | −.04 | −.07 | −.85** | −.58 | −.30 | −.41 |
| Periventricular-L | −.56* | −.04 | −.15 | −.19 | −.79** | −.56 | −.28 | −.44 |
| C semiovale-R | −.30 | −.05 | −.22 | −.27 | −.82** | −.56 | −.12 | −.32 |
| C semiovale-L | −.45 | .10 | −.22 | −.21 | −.76** | −.60 | −.14 | −.34 |
| CC genu | −.11 | −.11 | −.01 | −.01 | −.04 | −.05 | −.13 | −.01 |
| CC splenium | .05 | −.16 | .07 | .05 | .04 | .04 | −.14 | −.10 |
*Correlation differences associated with significant Fisher's z values using Bonferroni correction (according to the number of significant zero-order correlations in each condition). Only correlation differences that satisfy all three conditions of condition specificity (see Section 2.5) are marked with asterisks. Negative correlation differences imply greater degree of association between perfusion metrics and performance on the more demanding condition of each task.
Figure 2Correlation between performance accuracy and RT during the Complex Decision task and CBF/CBV values for CIS patients. Zero-order Pearson correlation coefficients between performance accuracy (a) and RT (b) during the Complex Decision task and CBF/CBV in 20 ROIs in the left (L) and right (R) hemispheres and the corpus callosum. Coefficients > 0.50 were significant at a Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of .0025 (indicated by horizontal solid lines). Asterisks indicate significant correlations which were also found to be condition specific (based on Fisher's z test for the difference between correlation coefficients in the “simple” and “executive” conditions).