Literature DB >> 24825754

The economic considerations and implications of the stratification of future oncology therapeutics.

Maria Gazouli1, Kyriakos Souliotis.   

Abstract

Cancer accounts for approximately 13 % of all deaths worldwide. Development of stratification biomarkers, for cancer screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment optimization, is a vital concept to facilitate disease prevention and drug development. The advent of stratified medicine should result in the safer, more effective use of therapeutic drugs to treat cancer, and in reducing the cost associated with inappropriate therapeutic regimens; however, many barriers delay the use of biomarkers in drug development and clinical practice. Since the incorporation of biomarkers in clinical practice might have additional initial costs, the question arises regarding whether the improvement in outcomes is reached at a realistic additional cost. This review presents an overview of economic issues surrounding biomarkers in cancer treatment optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825754     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-014-0102-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  26 in total

1.  Re: Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Gebra Carter; Lee Smolen; Lee Bowman; Philipp von Hohnhorst; Chris Seagle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection.

Authors:  Mark H Kawachi; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Barry; J Erik Busby; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; William J Catalona; Michael S Cookson; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Veda N Giri; George P Hemstreet; Richard J Howe; Paul H Lange; Hans Lilja; Kevin R Loughlin; James Mohler; Judd Moul; Robert B Nadler; Stephen G Patterson; Joseph C Presti; Antoinette M Stroup; Robert Wake; John T Wei
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Methods to elicit experts' beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration.

Authors:  Marta O Soares; Laura Bojke; Jo Dumville; Cynthia Iglesias; Nicky Cullum; Karl Claxton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Where medicine, business, and public policy intersect.

Authors:  Chantell L Wilson; Stephanie Schultz; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2007-02

5.  KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.

Authors:  Patricia R Blank; Holger Moch; Thomas D Szucs; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Biomarkers in cancer screening, research and detection: present and future: a review.

Authors:  S Kumar; A Mohan; R Guleria
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Heather-Jane Au; Dongsheng Tu; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Pierre K Isogai; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; William K Evans; Malcolm J Moore; Jehan Siddiqui; Brian Findlay; Bruce Colwell; John Simes; Peter Gibbs; Matthew Links; Niall C Tebbutt; Derek J Jonker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of pharmacogenetic and genomic screening programmes: a systematic review on content and adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  Stefan Vegter; Cornelis Boersma; Mark Rozenbaum; Bob Wilffert; Gerjan Navis; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ajay S Behl; Katrina A B Goddard; Thomas J Flottemesch; David Veenstra; Richard T Meenan; Jennifer S Lin; Michael V Maciosek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy.

Authors:  Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.