Literature DB >> 24825157

The morphometric study of l3-L4 and L4-L5 lumbar spine in Asian population using magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility analysis for transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.

Mohd Imran Yusof1, Eswaran Nadarajan, Mohd Shafie Abdullah.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study on the measurement of relevant magnetic resonance imaging parameters in 100 patients presented for lumbar spine assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine anatomical position of lumbar plexus and major blood vessels in relation to vertebral body and anterior edge of psoas muscle at L3-L4 and L4-L5 and to define the safe working zone for transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion has been shown to be safe and provides alternative for lumbar fusion. However, proximity of neurovascular structures may not allow a safe passage for this procedure in the Asian population.
METHODS: Relevant parameters were measured from axial magnetic resonance images and analyzed, including the psoas muscle and vertebrae endplate diameters, lumbar plexus and psoas muscle distance, lumbar plexus and vertebra body distance, and vena cava to the anterior vertebrae body diameters.
RESULTS: The mean anteroposterior diameters of the right and left psoas muscle ranged from 44.0 to 58.6 mm and 44.8 to 54.0 mm, respectively. The mean anteroposterior diameters of vertebra endplate of L3, L4, and L5 were 38.2 mm, 39.3 mm, and 41.4 mm, respectively. The mean distance of posterior border of vena cava from the vertebra body was 4.5 mm at L3-L4 and 14.1 mm at L4-L5.
CONCLUSION: L3-L4 fusion is feasible at both sides in both sexes; however, at L4-L5 level, the procedure is feasible only on the left side. The safe working zone for transpsoas approach to lumbar spine is significantly narrower at L4-L5 in both sexes. Anterior edge of psoas muscle can be used as a reliable guide to locate lumbar plexus within psoas muscle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825157     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar plexus nervous distortion in XLIF® approach: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Carlo Mandelli; Elena Virginia Colombo; Giovanni Marco Sicuri; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Guiding role of imaging evaluation in oblique lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Chaoyang Wang; Jiancheng Zeng; Zhiqiang Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-15

5.  Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Chunneng Huang; Zhengkuan Xu; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-06-26

6.  Integrated anatomy of the neuromuscular, visceral, vascular, and urinary tissues determined by MRI for a surgical approach to lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the presence or absence of spinal deformity.

Authors:  Shigeto Ebata; Tetsuro Ohba; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.