Literature DB >> 24825132

Assessment of individuals with BRCA1 and BRCA2 large rearrangements in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families.

Angela G Arnold1, Ebunoluwa Otegbeye, Megan Harlan Fleischut, Emily A Glogowski, Beth Siegel, Sherry R Boyar, Erin Salo-Mullen, Kim Amoroso, Margaret Sheehan, Janice L Berliner, Zsofia K Stadler, Noah D Kauff, Kenneth Offit, Mark E Robson, Liying Zhang.   

Abstract

BRCA1/2 large rearrangement (LR) testing has been available to patients since 2006. Three existing models commonly used in cancer genetics clinical and research settings (BRCAPRO, Penn II and Myriad II) have not been assessed for their performance in predicting the presence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements in patients who do not have mutations detectable by the traditional Sanger sequencing approach. This study sought to determine if there is an optimal pre-test probability "cut off" value, calculated using these models, to optimize detection of large rearrangements (LRs). Our cohort consisted of 3,301 probands seen for genetic counseling and BRCA1/2 clinical testing from September 2006 to September 2011. A detailed personal and three-generation family history, including self-reported ethnicity, was taken as part of our standard clinical practice. We applied the BRCAPRO, Penn II, and Myriad II models to the probands with LRs. In our cohort of 3,301 probands, 150 carried a non-Ashkenazi mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Seventeen unrelated probands carried a private BRCA1/2 LR (17/150, 11.3 % of all detectable non-AJ mutations). At a pre-test probability cutoff of 10 %, all three empiric risk models would have failed to identify almost 30 % of probands with LRs. Our study shows that BRCA1/2 LR testing should be offered to all women who meet criteria for BRCA1/2 sequence analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825132     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2987-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

1.  A recurrent pathogenic BRCA2 exon 5-11 duplication in the Christian Arab population in Israel.

Authors:  Hagit Baris-Feldman; Karin Weiss; Gili Reznick Levi; Gal Larom; Vered Ofen Glassner; Nina Ekhilevitch; Nitzan Sharon Swartzman; Tamar Paperna
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.446

2.  Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.

Authors:  Fei-Hung Hung; Yong Alison Wang; Jhih-Wei Jian; Hung-Pin Peng; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Chen-Fang Hung; Max M Yang; An-Suei Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Male Breast Cancer: Results of the Application of Multigene Panel Testing to an Italian Cohort of Patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Tedaldi; Michela Tebaldi; Valentina Zampiga; Ilaria Cangini; Francesca Pirini; Elisa Ferracci; Rita Danesi; Valentina Arcangeli; Mila Ravegnani; Giovanni Martinelli; Fabio Falcini; Paola Ulivi; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Importance of multigene panel test in patients with consanguineous marriage and family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Vahit Ozmen; Ahmet Okay Caglayan; Kanay Yararbas; Cetin Ordu; Fatma Aktepe; Tolga Ozmen; Ahmet Serkan Ilgun; Gursel Soybir; Gul Alco; Georgios N Tsaousis; Eirini Papadopoulou; Konstantinos Agiannitopoulos; Georgia Pepe; Stavroula Kampouri; George Nasioulas; Efe Sezgin; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Frequency of Rearrangements Versus Small Indels Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Turkish Patients with High Risk Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Hülya Yazıcı; Seda Kılıç; Demet Akdeniz; Özge Şükrüoğlu; Şeref Buğra Tuncer; Mukaddes Avşar; Gözde Kuru; Betül Çelik; Seden Küçücük; Pınar Saip
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.