Literature DB >> 24825001

Correlation of adherence to the 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines with patient outcomes in the treatment of diabetic foot infections in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial programme.

L M Pence1, C M Mock, M B Kays, K M Damer, E W Muloma, S M Erdman.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate adherence to the 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines for the management of patients with diabetic foot infections and to determine an association between adherence and clinical outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the management and clinical outcomes of patients with diabetic foot infections treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2012 at Wishard Health Services/Eskenazi Health. Adherence to individual Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection treatment guideline recommendations was measured, and then assessed in relation to clinical outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (61% male, mean age 54 years) with moderate to severe diabetic foot infection met the inclusion criteria. None of the treatment courses of these patients adhered to all the Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline recommendations. The recommendations most frequently adhered to were consultation of appropriate multidisciplinary teams (n=54, 94.7%) and performance of diagnostic imaging (n=52, 89.5%). The recommendations least frequently adhered to were diabetic foot wound classification scoring on admission (n=0, 0%), appropriate culture acquisition (n=12, 21.2%), surgical intervention when indicated (n=32, 46.2%) and appropriate empiric antibiotic selection (n=34, 59.7%). Of 56 patients, 52 (92.9%) experienced clinical cure at the end of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy compared with 34 of 53 patients (64%) at 6 months after the completion of therapy. Adherence to individual guidelines was not associated with clinical outcome. Patients who experienced treatment failure were more likely to have severe diabetic foot infection or peripheral neuropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection guideline recommendations was found to be suboptimal in the present study. The effect of adhering to individual Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection recommendations on clinical outcome needs to be investigated.
© 2014 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2014 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24825001     DOI: 10.1111/dme.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  3 in total

1.  Prescribing antibiotics in diabetic foot infection: what is the role of initial microscopy and culture of tissue samples?

Authors:  Robin Chisman; Danielle Lowry; Mujahid A Saeed; Alok Tiwari; Miruna D David
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Recent Anti-Microbial Exposure Is Associated with More Complications after Elective Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher A Guidry; Puja M Shah; Zachary C Dietch; Nathan R Elwood; Elizabeth D Krebs; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Insoles Treated with Bacteria-Killing Nanotechnology Bio-Kil Reduce Bacterial Burden in Diabetic Patients and Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Difei Lu; Xiaohui Guo; Yun Li; Bo Zheng; Junqing Zhang
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.011

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.