AIMS: The 5-year, open-label, prospective, observational helping evaluate reduction in obesity (HERO) study (N = 1106) examines efficacy and safety of the LAP-BAND AP(®) laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) in obese patients. This interim analysis assessed the control of type 2 diabetes (T2D), 1 year after the implantation of the LAGB. METHODS: Baseline T2D was defined by chart review or use of antidiabetic medications or haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0%. Control of T2D at 1 year was defined as A1c <7.0% (with or without antidiabetic medications). RESULTS: After 1 year, 187 of 273 patients with T2D at baseline had adequate data available to assess T2D status, of which 135 patients (72.2%) achieved target control of T2D compared with 42.8% control rate at baseline. Independent predictors of achieving target control at 1 year included the following: (i) shorter diabetes duration odds ratio (OR) 0.914 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.839, 0.995, p = 0.038], (ii) not using insulin therapy OR 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06, 0.47, p < 0.001) and (iii) greater mean % weight loss OR 1.176 (95% CI, 1.093, 1.266, p < 0.001). Patients using insulin at baseline were 84% less likely to achieve control of T2D after 1 year; each additional year of diabetes at baseline reduced the likelihood of good control by 9%; and each 1% of weight loss increases the likelihood of good control by 18%. Rates of device-related adverse events and reoperations were low and were not significantly different between patients with and without baseline T2D at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Greater % weight loss, not using insulin therapy, and shorter disease duration predicted increased likelihood of target control of T2D, 1 year after implantation of the LAGB.
AIMS: The 5-year, open-label, prospective, observational helping evaluate reduction in obesity (HERO) study (N = 1106) examines efficacy and safety of the LAP-BAND AP(®) laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) in obesepatients. This interim analysis assessed the control of type 2 diabetes (T2D), 1 year after the implantation of the LAGB. METHODS: Baseline T2D was defined by chart review or use of antidiabetic medications or haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0%. Control of T2D at 1 year was defined as A1c <7.0% (with or without antidiabetic medications). RESULTS: After 1 year, 187 of 273 patients with T2D at baseline had adequate data available to assess T2D status, of which 135 patients (72.2%) achieved target control of T2D compared with 42.8% control rate at baseline. Independent predictors of achieving target control at 1 year included the following: (i) shorter diabetes duration odds ratio (OR) 0.914 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.839, 0.995, p = 0.038], (ii) not using insulin therapy OR 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06, 0.47, p < 0.001) and (iii) greater mean % weight loss OR 1.176 (95% CI, 1.093, 1.266, p < 0.001). Patients using insulin at baseline were 84% less likely to achieve control of T2D after 1 year; each additional year of diabetes at baseline reduced the likelihood of good control by 9%; and each 1% of weight loss increases the likelihood of good control by 18%. Rates of device-related adverse events and reoperations were low and were not significantly different between patients with and without baseline T2D at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Greater % weight loss, not using insulin therapy, and shorter disease duration predicted increased likelihood of target control of T2D, 1 year after implantation of the LAGB.
Authors: Jerry T. Dang; Caroline Sheppard; David Kim; Noah Switzer; Xinzhe Shi; Chunhong Tian; Christopher de Gara; Shahzeer Karmali; Daniel W. Birch Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: A Pucci; U Tymoszuk; W H Cheung; J M Makaronidis; S Scholes; G Tharakan; M Elkalaawy; M Guimaraes; M Nora; M Hashemi; A Jenkinson; M Adamo; M P Monteiro; N Finer; R L Batterham Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 4.359