Literature DB >> 24824096

Treatment of olecranon fractures with 2.4- and 2.7-mm plating techniques.

David S Wellman1, Lionel E Lazaro, Rachel M Cymerman, Thomas W Axelrad, David Leu, David L Helfet, Dean G Lorich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of olecranon fractures treated with 2.4- and 2.7-mm plate constructs.
DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series.
SETTING: One-level 1 trauma center and 1 tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: A 2.7- or 2.4-mm reconstruction plate was placed on the dorsal ulnar cortex and contoured to allow passage of either a 2.7- or 3.5-mm intramedullary screw. In 9 patients, additional plates were required to control comminution. Available computed tomographic (CT) scans were evaluated for the presence of comminution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).
RESULTS: All fractures were united. Average extension deficit was 4.2 degrees, and average flexion angle was 137.4 degrees. Outcome scores were completed by 94% (33/35) of study patients. Average DASH score was 6.6, and average MEPS score was 94.5. Implants were removed in 18 patients. In the cohort of patients with CT scans, 6 of the 7 fractures thought to be simple on plain film analysis were found to have occult comminution on CT scan.
CONCLUSIONS: Comminution should be considered in all olecranon fractures, even when plain films display simple patterns; although this did not affect treatment in this series of plated patients, it may be important if selecting tension band wiring. Fixation with 2.4- and 2.7-mm plates addresses comminution in olecranon fractures, avoiding the pitfalls of tension band wiring. In patients with completed outcome scores, 97% (32/33) reported their outcomes as good or excellent according to the MEPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24824096     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Standard Versus Extended Proximal Fixation Olecranon Plates for Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.

Authors:  Allison L Boden; Charles A Daly; Poonam P Dalwadi; Stephanie A Boden; William C Hutton; Raghuveer C Muppavarapu; Michael B Gottschalk
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-01-10

2.  [Olecranon fractures].

Authors:  M Hackl; V Rausch; C Ries; L P Müller; K Wegmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Mini-fragment plating of olecranon fractures is comparable to precontoured small-fragment plating.

Authors:  Harsh Wadhwa; Yousi A Oquendo; L Henry Goodnough; Malcolm R DeBaun; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-11

4.  The Evolution of Olecranon Fractures and Its Fixation Strategies.

Authors:  Bryan Yijia Tan; Jingwen Ng; Wei Xiang Ng; Yuan Wei; Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Outcomes of embedded rafting k-wire technique for intermediate articular fragment fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures.

Authors:  Jae-Woo Cho; Jong-Keon Oh; Jaewoong Um; Hoon-Sang Sohn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Augmented intramedullary screw tension band construct for olecranon fracture reduction and fixation: a review of literature and surgical technique.

Authors:  Joseph T Labrum; Brock D Foster; Douglas R Weikert
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.