Abigale L Ottenberg1, Katlyn E Cook1, Rachel J Topazian1, Luke A Mueller1, Paul S Mueller1, Keith M Swetz2. 1. From the Program in Professionalism and Ethics (A.L.O., K.E.C., P.S.M.) and Division of General Internal Medicine (K.E.C., R.J.T., L.A.M., P.S.M., K.M.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. From the Program in Professionalism and Ethics (A.L.O., K.E.C., P.S.M.) and Division of General Internal Medicine (K.E.C., R.J.T., L.A.M., P.S.M., K.M.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. swetz.keith@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients undergo major physical and psychological changes after implantation of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy (DT). We sought to qualitatively study outcomes and attitudes of patients after DT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ambulatory outpatients with DT at our institution were invited to be interviewed between June and August 2011. In-person interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The study included 12 patients (11 men) from the Midwestern United States with a median age of 71.5 years (range, 33-78 years). Interviews were conducted at a median (range) time of 1.37 (0.43-5.04) years after DT implantation. Most patients were white (n=11), married (n=10), and Christian (n=10). We identified 6 themes commonly discussed by the interviewees: preparedness planning, new lease on life, optimizing support networks, systemic limitations, reflections on time, and communication matters. Analysis revealed that most patients saw DT as their only choice, despite other alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory patients reported varied experiences after DT but commonly reported gratitude for improved functional status and a perception of improved symptom burden. Recommendations for improving post-DT care include developing patient support systems, systematizing education for community providers, and expanding respite services.
BACKGROUND:Patients undergo major physical and psychological changes after implantation of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy (DT). We sought to qualitatively study outcomes and attitudes of patients after DT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ambulatory outpatients with DT at our institution were invited to be interviewed between June and August 2011. In-person interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The study included 12 patients (11 men) from the Midwestern United States with a median age of 71.5 years (range, 33-78 years). Interviews were conducted at a median (range) time of 1.37 (0.43-5.04) years after DT implantation. Most patients were white (n=11), married (n=10), and Christian (n=10). We identified 6 themes commonly discussed by the interviewees: preparedness planning, new lease on life, optimizing support networks, systemic limitations, reflections on time, and communication matters. Analysis revealed that most patients saw DT as their only choice, despite other alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory patients reported varied experiences after DT but commonly reported gratitude for improved functional status and a perception of improved symptom burden. Recommendations for improving post-DT care include developing patient support systems, systematizing education for community providers, and expanding respite services.
Authors: Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock; Madhav P Narayan; Carolyn Nowels; Jocelyn S Thompson; Anne Cannon; William J Bradley; Larry A Allen Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Brandon P Verdoorn; Angela J Luckhardt; Sara E Wordingham; Shannon M Dunlay; Keith M Swetz Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Kristin M Kostick; Estevan D Delgado; Robert J Volk; Holland M Kaplan; L A Wilhelms; Sheryl A McCurdy; Jerry D Estep; Matthias Loebe; Courtenay R Bruce Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 10.247