Literature DB >> 24823662

Brainstem response to speech and non-speech stimuli in children with learning problems.

Saeed Malayeri1, Yones Lotfi2, Seyed Abdollah Moossavi3, Reza Rostami4, Soghrat Faghihzadeh5.   

Abstract

Neuronal firing synchronization is critical for recording auditory responses from the brainstem. Recent studies have shown that both click and/da/synthetic syllable (speech) stimuli perform well in evoking neuronal synchronization at the brainstem level. In the present study, brainstem responses to click and speech stimuli were compared between children with learning problems (LP) and those with normal learning (NL) abilities. The study included 49 children with LP and 34 children with NL. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to 100-μs click stimulus and speech ABR (sABR) to/da/40-ms stimulus were tested in these children. Wave latencies III, V, and Vn and inter-peak latency (IPL) V-Vn in click ABR and wave latencies I, V, and A and IPL V-A in sABR were significantly longer in children with LP than children with NL. Except IPL of I-III, a significant positive correlation was observed between click ABR and sABR wave latencies and IPLs in children with NL; this correlation was weaker or not observed in children with LP. In this regard, the difference between correlation coefficients of wave latencies I, III, and V and IPLs I-V and V-Vn/V-A was significant in the two groups. Deficits in auditory processing timing in children with LP may have probably affected ABR for both click and speech stimuli. This finding emphasizes the possibility of shared connections between processing timing for speech and non-speech stimuli in auditory brainstem pathways. Weak or no correlation between click and speech ABR parameters in children with LP may have a clinical relevance and may be effectively used for objective diagnoses after confirming its sufficient sensitivity and specificity and demonstrating its acceptable validity with more scientific evidence.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24823662     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  4 in total

1.  Auditory learning through active engagement with sound: biological impact of community music lessons in at-risk children.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Jessica Slater; Elaine C Thompson; Jane Hornickel; Dana L Strait; Trent Nicol; Travis White-Schwoch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation.

Authors:  Taissane Rodrigues Sanguebuche; Luize Caroline Lima da Silva; Bruna Pias Peixe; Débora Durigon da Silva; Michele Vargas Garcia
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-22

3.  A novel method of brainstem auditory evoked potentials using complex verbal stimuli.

Authors:  Sophia N Kouni; Constantinos Koutsojannis; Nausika Ziavra; Sotirios Giannopoulos
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08

4.  Auditory Evoked Potentials with Different Speech Stimuli: a Comparison and Standardization of Values.

Authors:  Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Sheila Jacques Oppitz; Jordana Folgearini; Eliara Pinto Vieira Biaggio; Michele Vargas Garcia
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.