Literature DB >> 24823322

Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire--NQ.

Eirini P Grammatopoulou1, Emmanouil K Skordilis, Georgios Georgoudis, Aikaterini Haniotou, Afroditi Evangelodimou, George Fildissis, Theodoros Katsoulas, Panagiotis Kalagiakos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Nijmegen questionnaire (NQ) has previously been used for screening the hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) in asthmatics. However, no validity study has been reported so far.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the NQ in asthma patients and identify the prevalence of HVS.
METHODS: The NQ (n = 162) was examined for translation, construct, cross-sectional and discriminant validity as well as for internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis revealed a single factor solution with 11 items and 58.6% of explained variability. These 11 NQ items showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (IR = 0.98). Higher NQ scores were found in the following subgroups: women versus men (p < 0.01); participants with moderate versus mild asthma (p < 0.001) or uncontrolled versus controlled asthma (p < 0.001), and participants with breath-hold time (BHT) < 30 versus ≥ 30 s (p < 0.01) or end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) ≤ 35 versus >35 mmHg (p < 0.001). A cut-off score of >17 discriminated the participants with regard to the presence of HVS. The NQ showed 92.73% sensitivity and 91.59% specificity. The total NQ score was found significantly correlated with ETCO2 (r = -0.68), RR (r = 0.66) and BHT (r = -0.65). The prevalence of HVS was found 34%.
CONCLUSION: The NQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire for screening HVS in patients with stable mild-to-moderate asthma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperventilation; Nijmegen questionnaire; reliability; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24823322     DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2014.922190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  7 in total

1.  The Optimal Cut-off Score of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for Diagnosing Hyperventilation Syndrome Using a Bayesian Model in the Absence of a Gold Standard.

Authors:  Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha; Fatemeh Masaebi; Mohsen Abedi; Navid Mohseni; Atefeh Fakharian
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  The Nijmegen Questionnaire and dysfunctional breathing.

Authors:  Jan van Dixhoorn; Hans Folgering
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 3.  Breathing training for dysfunctional breathing in asthma: taking a multidimensional approach.

Authors:  Rosalba Courtney
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  Dyspnoea, hyperventilation and functional cough: a guide to which tests help sort them out.

Authors:  Andrew Robson
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2017-03

5.  Investigating components of pranayama for effects on heart rate variability.

Authors:  Erica Sharpe; Alison Lacombe; Adam Sadowski; John Phipps; Ryan Heer; Savita Rajurkar; Douglas Hanes; Ripu D Jindal; Ryan Bradley
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.620

6.  Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire in Iranians with Asthma.

Authors:  Majid Ravanbakhsh; Moslem Nargesi; Hanieh Raji; Maryam Haddadzadeh Shoushtari
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2015

7.  Association of dysfunctional breathing with health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study in a young population.

Authors:  Ji-Myung Ok; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.