Literature DB >> 24822096

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided versus conventional transbronchial needle aspiration: time to re-evaluate the relationship?

Andrew Rl Medford1.   

Abstract

Year:  2014        PMID： 24822096      PMCID： PMC4014991          DOI： 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN： 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

1.  Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance.

Authors:  D R Baldwin; B White; M Schmidt-Hansen; A R Champion; A M Melder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-04-27

2.  Greater physician involvement improves coding outcomes in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration procedures.

Authors:  Anilkumar Pillai; Andrew R L Medford
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  K P Wang; R Brower; E F Haponik; S Siegelman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  A prospective study of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration: performance and cost utility.

Authors:  A R L Medford; S Agrawal; C M Free; J A Bennett
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.580

5.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration vs conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Dheeraj Gupta; Devendra S Dadhwal; Ritesh Agarwal; Nalini Gupta; Amanjit Bal; Ashutosh N Aggarwal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Cytology of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration versus conventional transbronchial needle aspiration.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Stoll; Rex Chin Wei Yung; Douglas P Clark; Qing Kay Li
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Felix Herth; Heinrich D Becker; Armin Ernst
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Impact of needle gauge on characterization of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) histology samples.

Authors:  Abiramy Jeyabalan; Golda Shelley-Fraser; Andrew R L Medford
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 6.424

9.  Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Wallace; Jorge M S Pascual; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy A Woodward; Barbara L McComb; Julia E Crook; Margaret M Johnson; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Seth A Gross; Surakit Pungpapong; Joy N Hardee; John A Odell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Suitability of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for subtyping and genotyping of non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study of 774 patients.

Authors:  Neal Navani; James M Brown; Matthew Nankivell; Ian Woolhouse; Richard N Harrison; Vandana Jeebun; Mohammed Munavvar; Benjamin J Ng; Doris M Rassl; Mary Falzon; Gabrijela Kocjan; Robert C Rintoul; Andrew G Nicholson; Sam M Janes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 21.405
View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and adequacy of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration of IASLC stations 4R, 4L and 7 using endobronchial landmarks provided by the Wang nodal mapping system in the staging of lung cancer.

Authors:  Qinghua Liu; Songyan Han; Sixto Arias; J Francis Turner; Hans Lee; Robert Browning; Ko-Pen Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.500
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.