| Literature DB >> 24821844 |
Joseph A Lewnard, Lea Berrang-Ford, Shuaib Lwasa, Didacus Bambaiha Namanya, Kaitlin A Patterson, Blánaid Donnelly, Manisha A Kulkarni, Sherilee L Harper, Nicholas H Ogden, Cesar P Carcamo.
Abstract
Although malnutrition and malaria co-occur among individuals and populations globally, effects of nutritional status on risk for parasitemia and clinical illness remain poorly understood. We investigated associations between Plasmodium falciparum infection, nutrition, and food security in a cross-sectional survey of 365 Batwa pygmies in Kanungu District, Uganda in January of 2013. We identified 4.1% parasite prevalence among individuals over 5 years old. Severe food insecurity was associated with increased risk for positive rapid immunochromatographic test outcome (adjusted relative risk [ARR] = 13.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.23-76.79). High age/sex-adjusted mid-upper arm circumference was associated with decreased risk for positive test among individuals who were not severely food-insecure (ARR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.19-0.69). Within Batwa pygmy communities, where malnutrition and food insecurity are common, individuals who are particularly undernourished or severely food-insecure may have elevated risk for P. falciparum parasitemia. This finding may motivate integrated control of malaria and malnutrition in low-transmission settings. © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24821844 PMCID: PMC4080566 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Figure 1.Map of the study region. The locations of 10 Batwa settlements within Kanungu District, Western Region, Uganda (Inset) are shown. The study communities are situated between the Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
Characteristics of the study population (individuals)
| Variables | Total | Males | Females |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 365 (100) | 167 (100) | 198 (100) |
| 6–12 | 103 (28) | 53 (32) | 50 (25) |
| 13–23 | 92 (25) | 42 (25) | 50 (25) |
| 24–35 | 81 (22) | 30 (18) | 51 (26) |
| 36–47 | 40 (11) | 20 (12) | 20 (10) |
| 48–59 | 29 (8) | 13 (8) | 16 (8) |
| 60+ | 20 (5) | 9 (5) | 11 (6) |
| Malaria infection | 15 (4) | 11 (7) | 4 (2) |
| Protective measures | |||
| Sleeping under ITNs last night | 174 (48) | 82 (49) | 92 (47) |
| Environment (clearing brush near home, draining stagnant water) | 143 (39) | 69 (41) | 74 (37) |
| Closing windows and doors at night | 125 (34) | 57 (34) | 68 (34) |
| Daily forest exposure | |||
| Spends no time in forest during the day | 189 (53) | 89 (53) | 106 (54) |
| Spends less than one-half of the day in forest | 150 (41) | 64 (38) | 86 (43) |
| Spends about one-half of the day in forest | 14 (4) | 6 (4) | 8 (4) |
| Spends more than one-half of the day in forest | 3 (1) | 3 (2) | 0 (0) |
| Spends all day in forest | 6 (2) | 6 (4) | 0 (0) |
| Spends time at night in forest (not excluding other categories) | 4 (1) | 0 (0) | 4 (2) |
| Other daily environmental exposures | |||
| Any time in fields | 265 (73) | 112 (67) | 153 (77) |
| Any time near rivers or lakes | 236 (65) | 104 (62) | 132 (67) |
| Any time in or near animal sheds | 58 (16) | 26 (16) | 32 (16) |
| MUAC | |||
| ≤ 1 SD below mean for age and sex | 46 (13) | 22 (13) | 24 (12) |
| −0.99–0 SD below mean for age and sex | 152 (42) | 67 (40) | 85 (43) |
| 0.01–1 SD above mean for age and sex | 116 (32) | 51 (31) | 65 (33) |
| > 1 SD above mean for age and sex | 51 (14) | 27 (16) | 24 (12) |
| Knowledge of malaria | |||
| Identifying mosquito as vector | 290 (79) | 140 (84) | 150 (76) |
| Identifying ITNs as a preventative measure | 155 (43) | 73 (44) | 82 (41) |
| Identifying insecticide sprays as a preventative measure | 88 (24) | 38 (23) | 50 (25) |
Characteristics of the study population (households)
| Variables | Households | Individuals |
|---|---|---|
| 120 (100) | 365 (100) | |
| Malaria infection | 13 (11) | 15 (4) |
| Household food insecurity | ||
| Food security | 1 (< 1) | 1 (< 1) |
| Mild food insecurity | 8 (7) | 19 (5) |
| Moderate food insecurity | 44 (37) | 117 (32) |
| Severe food insecurity | 67 (56) | 228 (62) |
| Protective measures | ||
| Living in a household with indoor residual spraying in past 12 months | 4 (3) | 18 (5) |
| Household wealth indicators | ||
| Household owns any livestock | 27 (23) | 87 (24) |
| Household receives money from family/friends outside the community | 23 (19) | 84 (23) |
| Either household wealth indicator | 45 (38) | 146 (40) |
| Number of children living in household | ||
| 0–1 | 40 (33) | 79 (22) |
| 2–3 | 37 (31) | 97 (27) |
| 4–5 | 35 (29) | 137 (38) |
| 6–7 | 8 (7) | 52 (14) |
MUAC observations
| Age/sex | Percentile | MUAC (cm) | MUAC normal score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6–8 years | |||
| Male | 25 | 15 | −0.89 |
| Male | 50 | 17 | 0.08 |
| Male | 75 | 18 | 0.57 |
| Female | 25 | 16 | −0.55 |
| Female | 50 | 16 | −0.55 |
| Female | 75 | 18 | 0.33 |
| 9–11 years | |||
| Male | 25 | 16 | −0.78 |
| Male | 50 | 17 | −0.25 |
| Male | 75 | 18 | 0.28 |
| Female | 25 | 16.3 | −0.50 |
| Female | 50 | 17 | −0.24 |
| Female | 75 | 18.8 | 0.38 |
| 12–14 years | |||
| Male | 25 | 17 | −0.69 |
| Male | 50 | 18 | −0.27 |
| Male | 75 | 20 | 0.56 |
| Female | 25 | 20 | −0.53 |
| Female | 50 | 20.5 | −0.38 |
| Female | 75 | 22.8 | 0.33 |
| 15–17 years | |||
| Male | 25 | 19.3 | −0.85 |
| Male | 50 | 22.5 | 0.29 |
| Male | 75 | 23 | 0.46 |
| Female | 25 | 22.8 | −0.57 |
| Female | 50 | 23.5 | −0.32 |
| Female | 75 | 27.3 | 0.89 |
| 18 + years | |||
| Male | 25 | 22 | −0.83 |
| Male | 50 | 24.3 | −0.08 |
| Male | 75 | 26 | 0.68 |
| Female | 25 | 21 | −0.71 |
| Female | 50 | 23 | −0.07 |
| Female | 75 | 25 | 0.57 |
Results of the log-binomial generalized linear model
| RR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Univariable (unadjusted) RR | Multivariable ARR | |
| Age (years) | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) |
| Male sex | 3.26 | 3.35 |
| Daily forest exposure | 2.20 (0.87–5.53) | 1.80 |
| Asset ownership | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Severe food insecurity | 8.41 | 13.09 |
| Age/sex-adjusted MUAC | 0.83 (0.43–1.61) | |
| Not severely food-insecure | 0.37 | |
| Severely food-insecure | 2.61 (0.85–7.99) | |
P < 0.001.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
Figure 2.Conditional effects of relative undernourishment by status as severely food-insecure. The fitted probability of a positive RDT outcome is shown for a 25-year-old man who enters the forest regularly and does not own animals or receive outside financial support with respect to relative nutritional status under the scenarios where the man is or is not severely food-insecure. The 95% confidence regions are distinct at z scores greater than −1 SD from the mean. Est = estimated.