Literature DB >> 24821674

Regulatory challenges for GM crops in developing economies: the African experience.

Francis Nang'ayo1, Stella Simiyu-Wafukho, Sylvester O Oikeh.   

Abstract

Globally, transgenic or genetically modified (GM) crops are considered regulated products that are subject to regulatory oversight during trans-boundary movement, testing and environmental release. In Africa, regulations for transgenic crops are based on the outcomes of the historic Earth Summit Conference held in Rio, Brazil two decades ago, namely, the adoption of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the subsequent adoption of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. To exploit the potential benefits of transgenic crops while safeguarding the potential risks on human health and environment, most African countries have signed and ratified the CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Consequently, these countries are required to take appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to ensure that the handling and utilization of living modified organisms are undertaken in a manner that reduces the risks to humans and the environment. These countries are also expected to provide regulatory oversight on transgenic crops through functional national biosafety frameworks (NBFs). While in principle this approach is ideal, NBFs in most African countries are steeped in a host of policy, legal and operational challenges that appear to be at cross-purposes with the noble efforts of seeking to access, test and deliver promising GM crops for use by resource-limited farmers in Africa. In this paper we discuss the regulatory challenges faced during the development and commercialization of GM crops based on experiences from countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24821674     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-014-9805-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  1 in total

Review 1.  Regulating transgenic crops: a comparative analysis of different regulatory processes.

Authors:  Gregory Jaffe
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.788

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Introduction to ISBGMO12: biosafety research past, present and future.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Hector Quemada; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  The potential of using biotechnology to improve cassava: a review.

Authors:  Paul Chavarriaga-Aguirre; Alejandro Brand; Adriana Medina; Mónica Prías; Roosevelt Escobar; Juan Martinez; Paula Díaz; Camilo López; Willy M Roca; Joe Tohme
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.252

3.  Transgenic banana plants expressing Xanthomonas wilt resistance genes revealed a stable non-target bacterial colonization structure.

Authors:  Jean Nimusiima; Martina Köberl; John Baptist Tumuhairwe; Jerome Kubiriba; Charles Staver; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.