| Literature DB >> 24821500 |
Yutaka Kondo1, Yasutoshi Murayama1, Hirotaka Konishi1, Ryo Morimura1, Shuhei Komatsu1, Atsushi Shiozaki1, Yoshiaki Kuriu1, Hisashi Ikoma1, Takeshi Kubota1, Masayoshi Nakanishi1, Daisuke Ichikawa1, Hitoshi Fujiwara1, Kazuma Okamoto1, Chouhei Sakakura1, Kiwamu Takahashi2, Katsushi Inoue2, Motowo Nakajima2, Eigo Otsuji1.
Abstract
A precise diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination is necessary to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for colorectal cancer. However, small peritoneal dissemination is difficult to diagnose. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is an intermediate substrate of heme metabolism. The administration of 5-ALA to cancer patients results in tumor-specific accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), which emits red fluorescence with blue light irradiation. We evaluated the usefulness of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) using 5-ALA to detect the peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer. EGFP-tagged HT-29 cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity of BALB/c nude mice. After 2 weeks, the mice were given 5-ALA hydrochloride, and metastatic nodules in the omentum were observed with white light and fluorescence images. Twelve colorectal cancer patients suspected to have serosal invasion according to preoperative computed tomography (CT) were enrolled in this study. 5-ALA (15-20 mg per kg body weight) was administered orally to the patients 3 h before surgery. The abdominal cavity was observed under white light and fluorescence. Fluorescence images were analyzed with image analysis software (ImageJ 1.45s, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The mice developed peritoneal disseminations. The observed 5-ALA-induced red fluorescence was consistent with the EGFP fluorescent-positive nodules. Peritoneal dissemination was observed with conventional white light imaging in 8 patients. All nodules suspected as being peritoneal dissemination lesions by white light observation were similarly detected by ALA-induced fluorescence. In 1 patient, a small, flat lesion that was missed under white light observation was detected by ALA-induced fluorescence; the lesion was pathologically diagnosed as peritoneal metastasis. In the quantitative fluorescence image analysis, the red/(red + green + blue) ratio was higher in the metastatic nodules compared to the non-metastatic sites of the abdominal wall, fat and liver. We demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy using 5-ALA-PDD compared to conventional laparoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer. 5-ALA-PDD is a promising candidate method for diagnosing peritoneal dissemination of colorectal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24821500 PMCID: PMC4079156 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oncol ISSN: 1019-6439 Impact factor: 5.650
Figure 1.Imaging of peritoneal metastases with 5-ALA in a xenograft mouse model with human colorectal cancer cells. (A) A microscopic image of the abdominal cavity of the mouse 5 weeks after the HT-29/EGFP cell implantation. (B) The mesenteric lesion, profiled by a dashed line in (A), was examined under white light. (C) On the fluorescence image in the same view, PpIX-induced red fluorescence was detected in the mesenteric nodules. (D) The observed GFP-induced green fluorescence was consistent with the PpIX-induced fluorescence. Scale bar, 1 mm.
Enrolled patients.
| Case | Gender | Age (years) | Tumor location | Histology | cT | cN | cM | Operation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 82 | S | tub2>por2 | 4a | 1b | 1a PER | Sigmoidectomy | Laparotomy |
| 2 | Male | 39 | S | tub1>tub2 | 4a | 1b | 1a PUL | Sigmoidectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 3 | Female | 47 | Ra | tub1 | 4a | 2a | 1a PER | Ileostomy | Laparotomy |
| 4 | Male | 43 | S | Por2>tub1 | 4a | 2b | 1b HEP LYM | Sigmoidectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 5 | Male | 66 | S | tub1 | 4a | 0 | 0 | Sigmoidectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 6 | Male | 62 | D | tub1>tub2 | 4a | 2a | 0 | Left hemicolectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 7 | Male | 84 | S | tub1>tub2 | 4a | 2a | 1a HEP | Right hemicolectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 8 | Male | 69 | S | tub1>tub2 | 4a | 2b | 1b HEP LYM OTH | Ileostomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 9 | Female | 55 | A | tub2>tub1 | 4a | 1b | 1b HEP PUL | Right hemicolectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 10 | Male | 72 | T, S, RS | tub1>tub2 | 4a | 2b | 1a PER | Hartmann | Laparotomy |
| 11 | Male | 74 | T | tub2>tub1 | 4a | 1b | 1a HEP | Right hemicolectomy | Laparoscopic surgery |
| 12 | Female | 45 | T | tub2>por2 | 4a | 1a | 1a OTH | Transverse colectomy | Laparotomy |
A, Ascending colon; T, Transverse colon; D, descending colon; S, sigmoid colon; RS, rectosigmoid; Ra, rectum above the peritoneal reflection. tub1, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; tub2, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por2, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma non-solid type.
Figure 2.A laparoscopic image of the peritoneal metastases under white light (top) and PpIX-induced fluorescence (bottom). The red fluorescence observed was consistent with nodules suspected to be peritoneal metastases under white light observation (left). This case was observed with a D-LIGHT system. One small lesion, which was difficult to identify under white light, was easily detected with PpIX fluorescence observation (right).
Comparison of 5-ALA mediated fluorescence laparoscopic imaging and pathological examination.
| Examination by FL
| Pathology
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Peritoneal dissemination | Liver metastasis | Depth of invasion | Peritoneal dissemintion |
| 1 | + | + | SE | + |
| 2 | + | + | SI (bladder) | + |
| 3 | + | − | + | |
| 4 | − | − | SE | − |
| 5 | − | − | SS | − |
| 6 | − | − | SS | − |
| 7 | + | + | SS | + |
| 8 | + | + | + | |
| 9 | − | + | SE | − |
| 10 | + | − | SS | + |
| 11 | + | + | SE | + |
| 12 | + | − | SE | + |
SS, tumor invades subserosa; SE, tumor perforates serosa; SI, tumor extending to adjacent organs; FL, fluorescence laparoscopy.
Figure 3.Box-and-whisker plots of a quantitative analysis of 5-ALA-induced fluorescence images. The red value of each 24-bit RGB color image was evaluated with a corresponding index for red fluorescence. The maximum red value of each peritoneal metastatic nodule and non-metastatic site of the abdominal wall, fat, and liver were compared (A). The red/(red + green + blue) ratio was also evaluated to correct for differences in the imaging conditions (B).