A Özge Sungur1, Karl J Vörckel1, Rainer K W Schwarting1, Markus Wöhr2. 1. Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Biological Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, D-35032 Marburg, Germany. 2. Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Biological Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, D-35032 Marburg, Germany. Electronic address: markus.woehr@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by persistent deficits in social behavior and communication, together with restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior. Several ASD candidate genes have been identified, including the SHANK gene family with its three family members SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3. METHODS: Typically, repetitive behavior in mouse models for ASD is assessed by measuring self-grooming behavior. The first aim of the current study was to assess repetitive behaviors in Shank1(-/-) null mutant, Shank1(+/-) heterozygous, and Shank1(+/+) wildtype littermate control mice by means of a comprehensive approach, including the assessment of self-grooming, digging behavior, and marble burying. The second aim was to establish a test paradigm that allows for assessing the effects of social context on the occurrence of repetitive behaviors in a genotype-dependent manner. To this aim, repetitive behaviors were repeatedly tested on three consecutive days in distinct social contexts, namely in presence or absence of social odors. RESULTS: Shank1(+/-) heterozygous and to a lesser extent Shank1(-/-) null mutant mice displayed slightly elevated levels of self-grooming behavior as adults, but not as juveniles, with genotype differences being most prominent in the social context. In contrast to elevated self-grooming behavior, marble burying was strongly reduced in adult Shank1(+/-) heterozygous and Shank1(-/-) null mutant mice across social contexts, as compared to adult Shank1(+/+) wildtype littermate controls. CONCLUSION: The opposite effects of the Shank1 deletion on the two types of repetitive behaviors are in line with a number of studies on repetitive behaviors in other genetic Shank models.
BACKGROUND:Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by persistent deficits in social behavior and communication, together with restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior. Several ASD candidate genes have been identified, including the SHANK gene family with its three family members SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3. METHODS: Typically, repetitive behavior in mouse models for ASD is assessed by measuring self-grooming behavior. The first aim of the current study was to assess repetitive behaviors in Shank1(-/-) null mutant, Shank1(+/-) heterozygous, and Shank1(+/+) wildtype littermate control mice by means of a comprehensive approach, including the assessment of self-grooming, digging behavior, and marble burying. The second aim was to establish a test paradigm that allows for assessing the effects of social context on the occurrence of repetitive behaviors in a genotype-dependent manner. To this aim, repetitive behaviors were repeatedly tested on three consecutive days in distinct social contexts, namely in presence or absence of social odors. RESULTS:Shank1(+/-) heterozygous and to a lesser extent Shank1(-/-) null mutant mice displayed slightly elevated levels of self-grooming behavior as adults, but not as juveniles, with genotype differences being most prominent in the social context. In contrast to elevated self-grooming behavior, marble burying was strongly reduced in adult Shank1(+/-) heterozygous and Shank1(-/-) null mutant mice across social contexts, as compared to adult Shank1(+/+) wildtype littermate controls. CONCLUSION: The opposite effects of the Shank1 deletion on the two types of repetitive behaviors are in line with a number of studies on repetitive behaviors in other genetic Shank models.
Authors: Martin Lackinger; A Özge Sungur; Reetu Daswani; Michael Soutschek; Silvia Bicker; Lea Stemmler; Tatjana Wüst; Roberto Fiore; Christoph Dieterich; Rainer Kw Schwarting; Markus Wöhr; Gerhard Schratt Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 8.807
Authors: Rebeca Mejias; Shu-Ling Chiu; Mei Han; Rebecca Rose; Ana Gil-Infante; Yifan Zhao; Richard L Huganir; Tao Wang Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Maria Chahrour; Brian J O'Roak; Emanuela Santini; Rodney C Samaco; Robin J Kleiman; M Chiara Manzini Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jared J Schwartzer; Milo Careaga; Morgan A Coburn; Destanie R Rose; Heather K Hughes; Paul Ashwood Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Bin Tang; Tingting Wang; Huida Wan; Li Han; Xiaoyan Qin; Yaoyang Zhang; Jian Wang; Chunlei Yu; Fulvia Berton; Walter Francesconi; John R Yates; Peter W Vanderklish; Lujian Liao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Allan V Kalueff; Adam Michael Stewart; Cai Song; Kent C Berridge; Ann M Graybiel; John C Fentress Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 34.870