| Literature DB >> 24820829 |
Akanksha Nigam, Shivam Priya, Preeti Bajpai, Sushil Kumar1.
Abstract
The altered cellular gene expression profile is being hypothesized as the possible molecular basis navigating the onset or progress of various morbidities. This hypothesis has been evaluated here in respect of Cr 6+ induced toxicity. Several studies using gene microarray show selective and strategic dysregulations of cellular genes and pathways induced by Cr 6+. Relevant literature has been reviewed to unravel these changes in different test systems after exposure to Cr 6+ and also to elucidate association if any, of the altered cytogenomics with Cr 6+ induced toxicity or carcinogenicity. The aim was to verify the hypothesis for critical role of altered cytogenomics in onset of Cr 6+ induced biological/clinical effects by identifying genes modulated commonly by the toxicant irrespective of test system or test concentrations/doses, and by scrutinizing their importance in regulation of the flow of mechanistically linked events crucial for resultant morbidities. Their probability as biomarkers to monitor the toxicant induced biological changes is speculative. The modulated genes have been found to cluster under the pathways that manage onset of oxidative stress, DNA damage, apoptosis, cell-cycle regulation, cytoskeleton, morphological changes, energy metabolism, biosynthesis, oncogenes, bioenergetics, and immune system critical for toxicity. In these studies, the identity of genes has been found to differ remarkably; albeit the trend of pathways' dysregulation has been found to remain similar. We conclude that the intensity of dysregulation of genes or pathways involved in mechanistic events forms a sub-threshold or threshold level depending upon the dose and type (including speciation) of the toxicant, duration of exposure, type of target cells, and niche microenvironment of cells, and the intensity of sub-threshold or threshold level of the altered cytogenomics paves way in toxicant exposed cells eventually either to opt for reversal to differentiation and growth, or to result in toxicity like dedifferentiation and apoptosis, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24820829 PMCID: PMC4069729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Dysregulated genes of stress response pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of apoptosis pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of cell cycle pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of DNA repair, metabolism pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of oncogene pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulation genes of energy metabolism pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of biosynthesis pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Dysregulated genes of immune system pathway in Cr6+ exposed cells
Fig.Sequentially, Cr6+, after the cellular uptake, can undergo metabolic reduction causing ROS generation, DNA damage (via route ‘1a’), and/or the altered gene expression in exposed cells (via route ‘1b’). In absence of ‘adequate DNA repair’ and the persistence of DNA damage, there could be limited options for the exposed cells. With ‘adequate-to-survive DNA repair’ option, toxicant exposed cells may either restore the normal process of cell growth & differentiation (via route ‘IIa’); or with ‘unrepaired or faultily-repaired-DNA option, cells may proceed to toxicity like cytotoxicity, necrosis, apoptosis (via route ‘IIb’) or to transformation into tumour phenotype (via route ‘IIc’). Hypothetically, this is a critical and decision-making step in Cr6+ exposed cell for cell fate decisions that can be accomplished by the dose specific change in cytogenomics profile, gene expression intensity, status of DNA repair, and pathways for navigation of Cr6+ toxicity.