Literature DB >> 24820454

Three-dimensional orbital dysmorphology in metopic synostosis.

Harib H Ezaldein1, Philipp Metzler1, John A Persing1, Derek M Steinbacher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metopic synostosis is characterized by trigonocephaly, lateral supraorbital retrusion, and hypotelorism. Most phenotypic evaluations have focused on the forehead without much emphasis on the orbits. The study seeks to explore differences in orbital dysmorphology for metopic and control patients, along with different degrees of metopic synostosis.
METHODS: Demographic and craniometric data were compiled. CT scans were digitized (Materialise) and metopic and control groups were compared. Degree of trigonocephaly was classified into moderate and severe cases based on endocranial bifrontal angle. Orbital plane angle, width, depth, volume, and corneal projection were measured. Statistical two-paired t-tests were used, with significance determined as p<0.05.
RESULTS: Forty-six CT scans were analyzed (23 affected, 23 controls). Mean ages (6 months metopic, 7 months control) and genders (18 males metopic, 10 males control) were determined. Orbital plane angle measurements showed differences between the metopic and the control (p=0.0002), along with a correlation to trigonocephaly (p=0.0097). Orbital width and height were insignificant between controls and overall metopics, though height was less in severe metopics (p=0.046 left, p=0.0337 right). Orbital Depth was significant between control and metopics (p=0.0106 left, p=0.0025 right), and pronounced in severe cases p=0.0349 left, p=0.0071 right). Corneal Projection correlates with metopic severity (p<0.01 left, right), while orbital volume showed insignificant change between control and metopic cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Orbital dysmorphology worsens with increasing degree of trigonocephaly, presenting additional functional defects. The true exorbitism most directly correlates with worsening trigonocephaly. Expanding and advancing the lateral orbital wall is a critical treatment element in correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Materialise; Metopic; Orbital dysmorphology; Synostosis; Trigonocephaly

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820454     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Intracranial Volume Quantification from 3D Photography.

Authors:  Liyun Tu; Antonio R Porras; Scott Ensel; Deki Tsering; Beatriz Paniagua; Andinet Enquobahrie; Albert Oh; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Comput Assist Robot Endosc Clin Image Based Proced (2017)       Date:  2017-09-08

2.  Why do metopic sutural synostoses angulate? The concept of nasion sutural complex and its implication on the management of hypotelorism-early results and proof of concept.

Authors:  Suhas Udayakumaran; Arjun Krishnadas; Pramod Subhash
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  "Validation of Artificial Intelligence Severity Assessment in Metopic Craniosynostosis".

Authors:  Alexandra Junn; Jacob Dinis; Sacha C Hauc; Madeleine K Bruce; Kitae E Park; Wenzheng Tao; Cameron Christensen; Ross Whitaker; Jesse A Goldstein; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-11-17

Review 4.  Cranial neural crest cell contribution to craniofacial formation, pathology, and future directions in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Taylor Nicholas Snider; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2014-09-16

5.  The Postoperative Morphometrics of Orbital and Maxillary Area for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Lijun Shi; Weimin Shen; Qingwen Gao; Liangliang Kong
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.046

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.