Literature DB >> 24820442

Perception and identification of random events.

Jiaying Zhao1, Ulrike Hahn2, Daniel Osherson3.   

Abstract

The cognition of randomness consists of perceptual and conceptual components. One might be able to discriminate random from nonrandom stimuli, yet be unable to identify which is which. In a series of experiments, we compare the ability to distinguish random from nonrandom stimuli to the accuracy with which given stimuli are identified as "random." In a further experiment, we also evaluate the encoding hypothesis according to which the tendency of a stimulus to be labeled random varies with the cognitive difficulty of encoding it (Falk & Konold, 1997). In our experiments, the ability to distinguish random from nonrandom stimuli is superior to the ability to correctly label them. Moreover, for at least 1 class of stimuli, difficulty of encoding fails to predict the probability of being labeled random, providing evidence against the encoding hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820442     DOI: 10.1037/a0036816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Betting on Illusory Patterns: Probability Matching in Habitual Gamblers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Andreas Wilke; Benjamin Scheibehenne; Paige McCanney; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

2.  Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability.

Authors:  Karl Halvor Teigen; Gideon Keren
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

3.  Alternation between different types of evidence attenuates judgments of severity.

Authors:  Jennifer C Whitman; Jiaying Zhao; Rebecca M Todd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?

Authors:  George D Farmer; Paul A Warren; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-01

5.  The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well-known and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.

Authors:  Vukašin Gligorić; Margarida Moreira da Silva; Selin Eker; Nieke van Hoek; Ella Nieuwenhuijzen; Uljana Popova; Golnar Zeighami
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2021-05-26

6.  Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural.

Authors:  Jan-Willem van Prooijen; Karen M Douglas; Clara De Inocencio
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-09-25

7.  A re-examination of "bias" in human randomness perception.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Umberto Gostoli; George D Farmer; Wael El-Deredy; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Regular and random judgements are not two sides of the same coin: Both representativeness and encoding play a role in randomness perception.

Authors:  Giorgio Gronchi; Steven A Sloman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.