Literature DB >> 24820405

Engineered nanoparticles. How brain friendly is this new guest?

Francesca A Cupaioli1, Fabio A Zucca1, Diana Boraschi2, Luigi Zecca3.   

Abstract

In the last 30 years, the use of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) has progressively increased in many industrial and medical applications. In therapy, NPs may allow more effective cellular and subcellular targeting of drugs. In diagnostic applications, quantum dots are exploited for their optical characteristics, while superparamagnetic iron oxides NPs are used in magnetic resonance imaging. NPs are used in semiconductors, packaging, textiles, solar cells, batteries and plastic materials. Despite the great progress in nanotechnologies, comparatively little is known to date on the effects that exposure to NPs may have on the human body, in general and specifically on the brain. NPs can enter the human body through skin, digestive tract, airways and blood and they may cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the central nervous system. In addition to the paucity of studies describing NP effects on brain function, some of them also suffer of insufficient NPs characterization, inadequate standardization of conditions and lack of contaminant evaluation, so that results from different studies can hardly be compared. It has been shown in vitro and in vivo in rodents that NPs can impair dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems. Changes of neuronal morphology and neuronal death were reported in mice treated with NPs. NPs can also affect the respiratory chain of mitochondria and Bax protein levels, thereby causing apoptosis. Changes in expression of genes involved in redox pathways in mouse brain regions were described. NPs can induce autophagy, and accumulate in lysosomes impairing their degradation capacity. Cytoskeleton and vesicle trafficking may also be affected. NPs treated animals showed neuroinflammation with microglia activation, which could induce neurodegeneration. Considering the available data, it is important to design adequate models and experimental systems to evaluate in a reliable and controlled fashion the effects of NPs on the brain, and generate data representative of effects on the human brain, thereby useful for developing robust and valid nanosafety standards.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood-brain barrier; Brain; Nanoparticle; Neurodegeneration; Neuroinflammation; Neurotoxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820405     DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  31 in total

Review 1.  Xenobiotic pulmonary exposure and systemic cardiovascular response via neurological links.

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Alaeddin B Abukabda; Steven L Hardy; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Copper oxide nanoparticles stimulate glycolytic flux and increase the cellular contents of glutathione and metallothioneins in cultured astrocytes.

Authors:  Felix Bulcke; Ralf Dringen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Uptake and metabolism of iron oxide nanoparticles in brain cells.

Authors:  Charlotte Petters; Ellen Irrsack; Michael Koch; Ralf Dringen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 4.  Tumor-associated macrophages: Role in the pathological process of tumorigenesis and prospective therapeutic use (Review).

Authors:  Olga V Zhukova; Tatiana F Kovaleva; Evgenia V Arkhipova; Sergey A Ryabov; Irina V Mukhina
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2020-08-28

5.  Encapsulation of epigallocatechin-3-gallate into albumin nanoparticles improves pharmacokinetic and bioavailability in rat model.

Authors:  Nithya Ramesh; Abul Kalam Azad Mandal
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 6.  In vivo Cell Tracking Using Non-invasive Imaging of Iron Oxide-Based Particles with Particular Relevance for Stem Cell-Based Treatments of Neurological and Cardiac Disease.

Authors:  Markus Aswendt; Jean-Luc Boulland; Jasna Lojk; Stefan Stamenković; Joel C Glover; Pavle Andjus; Fabrizio Fiori; Mathias Hoehn; Dinko Mitrecic; Mojca Pavlin; Stefano Cavalli; Caterina Frati; Federico Quaini
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Nanoparticle technology and stem cell therapy team up against neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Caroline Vissers; Guo-Li Ming; Hongjun Song
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

9.  Impacts of prenatal nanomaterial exposure on male adult Sprague-Dawley rat behavior and cognition.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi; Phoebe A Stapleton; Jessica J Stalnaker; Xuefang Ren; Heng Hu; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Carroll R McBride; Jinghai Yi; Kevin Engels; James W Simpkins
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-04-19

10.  Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells rescue rat hippocampal cells from aluminum oxide nanoparticle-induced apoptosis via regulation of P53, Aβ, SOX2, OCT4, and CYP2E1.

Authors:  Mona M Atia; Alshaimaa A I Alghriany
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.