Literature DB >> 24820205

Pentax Airway Scope® vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

H Hoshijima1, N Kuratani, Y Hirabayashi, R Takeuchi, T Shiga, E Masaki.   

Abstract

The Pentax Airway Scope(®) is a single-use optical videolaryngoscope designed to assist with difficult tracheal intubation. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of the Pentax Airway Scope with that of a conventional laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with 'normal' and 'difficult' airways. We included 17 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1801 participants. We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk or weighted mean differences. The relative risk (95% CI) of a Cormack-Lehane grade-1 laryngeal view was 2.40 (1.76-2.49) with the Pentax Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, p < 0.00001. We found no other differences between the two laryngoscopes. Despite a superior laryngeal view, the Pentax Airway Scope provides little clinical benefit over the conventional laryngoscope.
© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820205     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  8 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 2.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

Review 3.  Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Howle; Desire Onwochei; Siew-Ling Harrison; Neel Desai
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.713

4.  Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway.

Authors:  Jiyoung Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Ji Yeon Lee; Min Young Chang; Sook Young Lee; Jong Yeop Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Alice Loughnan; Carolyn Deng; Felicity Dominick; Lora Pencheva; Doug Campbell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-03-28

6.  Comparison of video-stylet and conventional laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adults with cervical spine immobilization: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  I-Wen Chen; Yu-Yu Li; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Ying-Jen Chang; Jen-Yin Chen; Ming-Chung Lin; Kuei-Fen Wang; Chien-Ming Lin; Ping-Wen Huang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Juncheol Lee; Youngsuk Cho; Wonhee Kim; Kyu-Sun Choi; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Hyungoo Shin; Chiwon Ahn; Jae Guk Kim; Min Kyun Na; Tae Ho Lim; Dong Won Kim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.