Yu-Ri Choi1, Kyoung-Nam Kim2, Kwang-Mahn Kim3. 1. Research Scientist, Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, and Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Professor, Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, and Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Professor, Department and Research Institute of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, and Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kmkim@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microwave irradiation and immersion in solutions have been recommended for denture disinfection. However, the effect of dry conditions and impression materials has not been completely evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of microwave irradiation and hydrogen peroxide for the disinfection of dental impression materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens (diameter 10 mm, thickness 2 mm) were made with polyvinyl siloxane. Experimental groups were treated with hydrogen peroxide (group H), microwave irradiation (group M), and a combination of both hydrogen peroxide and microwave irradiation (group MH) for 1 minute, 2 minutes, and 3 minutes. The control group was untreated. The total sample size was 120. The specimens were divided into 2 groups, those exposed to Streptococcus mutans and those exposed to Escherichia coli. The disinfection effect and physical properties (contact angle, compatibility with gypsum, strain in compression, tear strength) were evaluated. RESULTS: All 3 groups (H, M, MH) were effective in reducing the number of colony forming units (CFU) per unit volume (mL) for both S mutans and E coli compared with the control. The most significant reduction in the CFU/mL of both bacteria was noted in the MH group and was used to compare either treatment alone (P<.05). No statistically significant difference was noted between the control and treatment groups in terms of all of the physical properties tested (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Microwave irradiation was identified as a useful disinfection method against S mutans and E coli, especially when combined with H2O2, without adversely affecting the physical properties of dental impression materials.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microwave irradiation and immersion in solutions have been recommended for denture disinfection. However, the effect of dry conditions and impression materials has not been completely evaluated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of microwave irradiation and hydrogen peroxide for the disinfection of dental impression materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens (diameter 10 mm, thickness 2 mm) were made with polyvinyl siloxane. Experimental groups were treated with hydrogen peroxide (group H), microwave irradiation (group M), and a combination of both hydrogen peroxide and microwave irradiation (group MH) for 1 minute, 2 minutes, and 3 minutes. The control group was untreated. The total sample size was 120. The specimens were divided into 2 groups, those exposed to Streptococcus mutans and those exposed to Escherichia coli. The disinfection effect and physical properties (contact angle, compatibility with gypsum, strain in compression, tear strength) were evaluated. RESULTS: All 3 groups (H, M, MH) were effective in reducing the number of colony forming units (CFU) per unit volume (mL) for both S mutans and E coli compared with the control. The most significant reduction in the CFU/mL of both bacteria was noted in the MH group and was used to compare either treatment alone (P<.05). No statistically significant difference was noted between the control and treatment groups in terms of all of the physical properties tested (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Microwave irradiation was identified as a useful disinfection method against S mutans and E coli, especially when combined with H2O2, without adversely affecting the physical properties of dental impression materials.
Authors: Kuei-Ling Hsu; Abdulrahman A Balhaddad; Isadora Martini Garcia; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Vineet Dhar; Louis DePaola; Mary Anne Melo Journal: Saudi Dent J Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Joanna Wezgowiec; Anna Wieczynska; Mieszko Wieckiewicz; Anna Czarny; Andrzej Malysa; Piotr Seweryn; Marek Zietek; Anna Paradowska-Stolarz Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.623