S van Gorp1, R Deumens2, M Leerink3, S Nguyen3, E A Joosten4, M Marsala3. 1. 1] Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] Department of Anesthesiology, Neuroregeneration Laboratory, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2. Group of Neuropharmacology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Neuroregeneration Laboratory, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental animal study. OBJECTIVES: Stimulus-evoked below-level paw withdrawals in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) can be mediated solely by below-level spinal cord reflexes. Interpreting lowered thresholds for such responses as a model for chronic below-level pain after (thoracic contusion) SCI appears not appropriate, which requires reinterpretation of many prior results. However, how to reinterpret the changes in withdrawal thresholds and what can be a better alternative for pain/sensory assessments remains unclear. SETTING: University of California, San Diego. METHODS: We introduce a method using supraspinally mediated escape responses to assess pain-like sensitivity thresholds on a continuous/linear scale. To further understand the decrease in hindpaw withdrawal thresholds, we investigated whether they may be interpreted as spasticity. RESULTS: The escape response test can be used to assess SCI-induced changes in below-level sensory thresholds. These thresholds were found to increase soon after moderate or severe SCI, while, in parallel, hindpaw withdrawal thresholds decreased. However, the latter did not co-occur with spasticity, suggesting that SCI-induced increased withdrawal responses are probably best interpreted as a form of hyperreflexia with pathophysiological analogies of spasms and/or clonus, or a species-specific phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Decreased below-level withdrawal thresholds do not reflect pain-like hypersensitivity in rodent models of (thoracic contusion) SCI. A large body of previous preclinical SCI pain research needs reinterpretation. We actually found below-level thermal and mechanical hypoesthesia and we also excluded a relation between withdrawal hyperreflexia and spasticity. Withdrawal hyperreflexia might still prove useful to model spasms or clonus, which are, like hypoesthesia, also significant clinical problems after SCI.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental animal study. OBJECTIVES: Stimulus-evoked below-level paw withdrawals in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) can be mediated solely by below-level spinal cord reflexes. Interpreting lowered thresholds for such responses as a model for chronic below-level pain after (thoracic contusion) SCI appears not appropriate, which requires reinterpretation of many prior results. However, how to reinterpret the changes in withdrawal thresholds and what can be a better alternative for pain/sensory assessments remains unclear. SETTING: University of California, San Diego. METHODS: We introduce a method using supraspinally mediated escape responses to assess pain-like sensitivity thresholds on a continuous/linear scale. To further understand the decrease in hindpaw withdrawal thresholds, we investigated whether they may be interpreted as spasticity. RESULTS: The escape response test can be used to assess SCI-induced changes in below-level sensory thresholds. These thresholds were found to increase soon after moderate or severe SCI, while, in parallel, hindpaw withdrawal thresholds decreased. However, the latter did not co-occur with spasticity, suggesting that SCI-induced increased withdrawal responses are probably best interpreted as a form of hyperreflexia with pathophysiological analogies of spasms and/or clonus, or a species-specific phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Decreased below-level withdrawal thresholds do not reflect pain-like hypersensitivity in rodent models of (thoracic contusion) SCI. A large body of previous preclinical SCI pain research needs reinterpretation. We actually found below-level thermal and mechanical hypoesthesia and we also excluded a relation between withdrawal hyperreflexia and spasticity. Withdrawal hyperreflexia might still prove useful to model spasms or clonus, which are, like hypoesthesia, also significant clinical problems after SCI.
Authors: Zizhen Wu; Lin Li; Fuhua Xie; Junhui Du; Yan Zuo; Jeffrey A Frost; Susan M Carlton; Edgar T Walters; Qing Yang Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Gary H Blumenthal; Bharadwaj Nandakumar; Ashley K Schnider; Megan R Detloff; Jerome Ricard; John R Bethea; Karen A Moxon Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Anastasia V Keller; Kathlene M Rees; Erik J Seibt; B Danni Wood; Abigail D Wade; Johnny Morehouse; Alice Shum-Siu; David S K Magnuson Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Erin L K S Erskine; Brittney D Smaila; Ward Plunet; Jie Liu; Elizabeth E Raffaele; Wolfram Tetzlaff; John L K Kramer; Matt S Ramer Journal: Pain Rep Date: 2019-05-22