Literature DB >> 24819362

Concomitant coronary intervention is associated with poorer early and late clinical outcomes in selected elderly patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Daniel P Griese1, Wilko Reents2, Attila Tóth3, Sebastian Kerber3, Anno Diegeler2, Jörg Babin-Ebell2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among patients currently evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Limited data exist on the outcome of patients undergoing combined transcatheter treatment of aortic valve disease and CAD. The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on early and late clinical outcomes of patients receiving TAVI.
METHODS: TAVIs were performed through either transfemoral or transapical access using SAPIEN (XT), CoreValve or AcurateTA valves. PCI was decided by the interdisciplinary heart team and performed synchronously or as a staged procedure upfront. Standardized valve academic research consortium (VARC)-2 endpoints were used. In case of a staged approach, TAVI was defined as the index procedure. Thirty-day outcomes and Kaplan-Meier 2-year survival were analysed.
RESULTS: Of 411 TAVIs, 65 (16%) received PCI. Mean age was 82 years (P = 0.92) and mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) was 21.7% (TAVI + PCI) and 20.3% (TAVI; P = 0.47). PCI was performed as staged procedure upfront (74%) or synchronously (26%). In 95% of PCIs, a single coronary artery was treated, and 71% received bare metal stents. Incidence of myocardial infarction (6 vs 1%; P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (15 vs 5%; P = 0.01) were higher in the TAVI + PCI group, compared with the TAVI group. Synchronous (18%) vs staged (15%) approach for PCI had comparable early mortality (P = 1.0). Kaplan-Meier 2-year survival was poorer in the TAVI + PCI group (P = 0.03) with an odds ratio of 1.66 (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant PCI is--when based on current heart team practice--associated with increased early and late mortality in selected elderly patients undergoing TAVI.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve stenosis; Coronary artery disease; PCI; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819362     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

1.  Immediate outcome after sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Marco Barbanti; Giuseppe Santarpino; Wanda Deste; Corrado Tamburino; Simona Gulino; Sebastiano Immè; Emanuela Di Simone; Denise Todaro; Francesco Pollari; Theodor Fischlein; Keiichiro Kasama; Bart Meuris; Magnus Dalén; Ulrik Sartipy; Peter Svenarud; Jarmo Lahtinen; Jouni Heikkinen; Tatu Juvonen; Giuseppe Gatti; Aniello Pappalardo; Carmelo Mignosa; Antonino S Rubino
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Challenges of coronary angiography and intervention in patients previously treated by TAVI.

Authors:  Johannes Blumenstein; Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Luise Gaede; Joerg Kempfert; Thomas Walther; Christian Hamm; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  The safety of concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Fang-Yang Huang; Bao-Tao Huang; Tian-Yuan Xiong; Xiao-Bo Pu; Shi-Jian Chen; Mao Chen; Yuan Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Artery Revascularization Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Chun Shing Kwok; Sudhakar George; Davide Capodanno; Peter F Ludman; Jonathan N Townend; Sagar N Doshi; Saib S Khogali; Philippe Généreux; Howard C Herrmann; Mamas A Mamas; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Outcomes of concomitant percutaneous coronary interventions and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fadi Ghrair; Jad Omran; Joseph Thomas; Kristina Gifft; Haytham Allaham; Mohammad Eniezat; Arun Kumar; Tariq Enezate
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2020-12-27

8.  Staged versus concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention: A national analysis.

Authors:  Zachary Tran; Joseph Hadaya; Peter Downey; Yas Sanaiha; Arjun Verma; Richard J Shemin; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-02-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.