Literature DB >> 24819108

Does the removal of retained staples really improve postoperative chronic sequelae after transanal stapled operations?

Francesco Saverio Mari1, Giuseppe Nigri, Tatiana Di Cesare, Marcello Gasparrini, Barbara Flora, Carola Sebastiani, Alessandra Pancaldi, Antonio Brescia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal stapled procedures are increasingly being used. Several postoperative complications can be referred to their application, including those related to the presence of retained staples at the level of the staple line.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess whether the removal of the retained staples is a useful approach to improve some of the most common postoperative complications of these surgical techniques.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the One-Day Surgery Unit of St. Andrea Hospital. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent a stapled transanal procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. Patients included in the study were followed postoperatively for 1 year after surgery to identify the presence of retained staples.
INTERVENTIONS: If identified, the retained staples were removed endoscopically or transanally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After the staple removal, patients were followed with biweekly office visit for 2 months to evaluate the progression of symptoms.
RESULTS: From the 566 patients included in the study, 165 experienced postoperative complications, and in 66 of these cases, retained staples were found and removed. With the removal of retained staples, symptoms were almost all resolved or improved. In only 1 case did the retained staples removal not modify the symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The study design may have introduced potential selection bias. In addition, the study was limited by the lack of a specific questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the retained staples is an efficacious and safe procedure to solve or improve postoperative complications and should be always considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819108     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  2 in total

1.  STARR with Contour Transtar for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Mari; Massimo Pezzatini; Marcello Gasparrini; Brescia Antonio
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Qiu-Lan He; Wan-Jin Shao; Xin-Lin Chen; Hui Peng; Shang-Kui Xie; Xiao-Xue Wang; Dong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.585

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.