Marieke M ter Wee1, Debby den Uyl1, Maarten Boers2, Pit Kerstens3, Mike Nurmohamed2, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg2, Alexandre E Voskuyl1, Willem F Lems2. 1. Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands Department of Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute Reade, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute Reade, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, The Netherlands Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, Noord Holland, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, we documented the likely non-inferiority of Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA)-light therapy (methotrexate increased to 25 mg/week with initial prednisolone 30 mg/day) compared with the original COBRA therapy (methotrexate 7.5 mg/week, sulfasalazine 2 g/day, with initial prednisolone 60 mg/day) after 26 weeks in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the non-inferiority of COBRA-light versus COBRA after 1 year in terms of disease activity (DAS44), functional outcome (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) and radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS)), and to assess the effect of adding etanercept. METHODS: An open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of 162 patients with active early RA, following a treat-to-target protocol incorporating the addition of etanercept if DAS44 ≥1.6 at weeks 26 or 39. RESULTS: Both groups showed major improvements in DAS44 after 52 weeks: mean (SD) -2.41 (1.2) in the COBRA and -2.02 (1.0) in the COBRA-light group (p=ns). In both groups, functional ability improved and radiological progression of joints was minimal. At least one adverse event was reported in 96% of the patients in both groups. In total, 25 serious adverse events occurred: 9 vs 16 in COBRA and COBRA-light, respectively. Treatment actually instituted was often less intensive than required by the protocol: of the total population, 108 patients (67%) required etanercept (more in the COBRA-light group), but only 67 of these (62%) actually received it. CONCLUSIONS:Intensive COBRA or COBRA-light therapy has major, comparably favourable effects on disease activity, functional ability and radiological outcome after 1 year in patients with early RA. Protocolised addition of etanercept was often not implemented by treating rheumatologists, and patients receiving it appeared to have limited added benefit, probably because of low disease activity levels at its initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55552928. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recently, we documented the likely non-inferiority of Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA)-light therapy (methotrexate increased to 25 mg/week with initial prednisolone 30 mg/day) compared with the original COBRA therapy (methotrexate 7.5 mg/week, sulfasalazine 2 g/day, with initial prednisolone 60 mg/day) after 26 weeks in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the non-inferiority of COBRA-light versus COBRA after 1 year in terms of disease activity (DAS44), functional outcome (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) and radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS)), and to assess the effect of adding etanercept. METHODS: An open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of 162 patients with active early RA, following a treat-to-target protocol incorporating the addition of etanercept if DAS44 ≥1.6 at weeks 26 or 39. RESULTS: Both groups showed major improvements in DAS44 after 52 weeks: mean (SD) -2.41 (1.2) in the COBRA and -2.02 (1.0) in the COBRA-light group (p=ns). In both groups, functional ability improved and radiological progression of joints was minimal. At least one adverse event was reported in 96% of the patients in both groups. In total, 25 serious adverse events occurred: 9 vs 16 in COBRA and COBRA-light, respectively. Treatment actually instituted was often less intensive than required by the protocol: of the total population, 108 patients (67%) required etanercept (more in the COBRA-light group), but only 67 of these (62%) actually received it. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive COBRA or COBRA-light therapy has major, comparably favourable effects on disease activity, functional ability and radiological outcome after 1 year in patients with early RA. Protocolised addition of etanercept was often not implemented by treating rheumatologists, and patients receiving it appeared to have limited added benefit, probably because of low disease activity levels at its initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55552928. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anti-TNF; DMARDs (synthetic); Early Rheumatoid Arthritis; Outcomes research; Treatment
Authors: M M A Verhoeven; P M J Welsing; J W J Bijlsma; J M van Laar; F P J G Lafeber; J Tekstra; J W G Jacobs Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rep Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 4.592
Authors: Samina A Turk; Linda A Rasch; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Willem F Lems; Marjolein Sanberg; Lilian H D van Tuyl; Marieke M Ter Wee Journal: BMC Rheumatol Date: 2018-06-26
Authors: Tamarah D de Jong; Tanja Snoek; Elise Mantel; Conny J van der Laken; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Willem F Lems Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Yoony Y J Gent; Marieke M Ter Wee; Alexandre E Voskuyl; Debby den Uyl; Nazanin Ahmadi; Cristina Dowling; Cornelis van Kuijk; Otto S Hoekstra; Maarten Boers; Willem F Lems; Conny J van der Laken Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Lotte Heimans; Gülşah Akdemir; Kirsten V C Wevers-de Boer; Yvonne P Goekoop-Ruiterman; Esmeralda T Molenaar; Johannes H L M van Groenendael; Andreas J Peeters; Gerda M Steup-Beekman; Leroy R Lard; Peter B J de Sonnaville; Bernard A M Grillet; Tom W J Huizinga; Cornelia F Allaart Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: G Akdemir; I M Markusse; L Dirven; N Riyazi; G M Steup-Beekman; Pjsm Kerstens; W F Lems; Twj Huizinga; C F Allaart Journal: RMD Open Date: 2016-03-25
Authors: Marieke M Ter Wee; Veerle Mh Coupé; Debby den Uyl; Birgit S Blomjous; Esmee Kooijmans; Pit Jsm Kerstens; Mike T Nurmohamed; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Alexandre E Voskuyl; Maarten Boers; Willem F Lems Journal: RMD Open Date: 2017-10-25