Literature DB >> 24818208

Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis.

Eduardo Anitua, Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraist, Laura Piñas, Leire Begoña, Gorka Orive.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of a prosthesis on implant survival, crestal bone loss, and prosthetic complications; and to determine whether detrimental values for crown height space and crown-to-implant ratio exist for implant-supported restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extra-short implants (length ≤6.5 mm) supporting a fixed denture in the posterior mandible and followed for at least 12 months were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical examinations were conducted to retrieve data about patients' dental and medical history, prosthetic complications, antagonist type, crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, offset placement of the prosthesis, crestal bone loss, and implant failure.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (mean age, 60 ± 10 years) with 45 extra-short implants participated in this study. Patients were followed for up to 4 years (mean, 2 years) and no implants were lost. The mean crown-to-implant ratio was 2.4 (range, 1.5 to 3.69). Mean crown height space was 17.05 ± 3.05 mm, and 65.4% of the implants had a crown height space in the range of 15 to 20 mm. About 90% of the implants had a distal or mesial offset placement greater than 1 mm. The type of antagonist significantly affected marginal bone loss around extra-short implants: bone loss was greatest for implants opposing a partial denture (mean, 1.28 ± 1.09 mm) and was lower for implants opposing a natural dentition (mean, 0.73 ± 0.60 mm) or a complete denture (mean, 0.89 ± 0.60 mm). Analysis of marginal bone loss and the factors crown-to-implant ratio, crown height space, and offset placement according to antagonist dentition indicated a significant positive correlation only between bone loss and crown height space.
CONCLUSIONS: When an increased crown-to-implant ratio is present, crown height space may influence crestal bone loss more significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24818208     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible.

Authors:  Yuta Shimura; Yuji Sato; Noboru Kitagawa; Miyuki Omori
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-06-17

2.  Comparison of Short and Standard Implants in the Posterior Mandible: A 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Allahyar Geramy; Amirreza Rokn; Abbasali Keshtkar; Abbas Monzavi; Hamid Mahmood Hashemi; Tahereh Bitaraf
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-03

3.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials.

Authors:  Haruka Araki; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Hirofumi Yatani
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-01-29

5.  Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Aloy-Prósper; E Carramolino-Cuéllar; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; D Soto-Peñaloza; M Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 6.  Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review.

Authors:  J-L Sierra-Sánchez; F García-Sala-Bonmatí; A Martínez-González; C García-Dalmau; J-F Mañes-Ferrer; A Brotons-Oliver
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-05-01

7.  Comparing Short Dental Implants to Standard Dental Implants: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Abbasali Keshtkar; Abbas Monzavi; Kazem Hashemi; Tahereh Bitaraf
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-01-18

8.  Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Hilde Morales-Meléndez; Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez; David Morales-Schwarz; Roni Kolerman; Manuel Fernández-Domínguez; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Short Narrow Dental Implants versus Long Narrow Dental Implants in Fixed Prostheses: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Eduardo Antiua; Virginia Escuer; Mohammad H Alkhraisat
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.