BACKGROUND: Patients with postbariatric bacterial overgrowth were reinvestigated after a follow-up of 15 years. It was hypothesized that systemic associations analogous to those reported for whole gut microbiome would be revealed. METHODS: Patients (n = 37, 70.3 % females, 42.4 ± 9.9 years old, preoperative BMI 53.5 ± 10.6 kg/m(2), current BMI 32.8 ± 10.8 kg/m(2)), all submitted to RYGB on account of morbid obesity, were followed during 176.8 ± 25.7 months. Blood tests included fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, liver and pancreatic enzymes, and lipid fractions. Bacterial overgrowth was diagnosed by quantitative culture of gastric fluid in both the excluded remnant and the gastric pouch, with the help of double-balloon enteroscopy. Absolute counts of aerobes and anaerobes in both gastric reservoirs were correlated with nutritional and biochemical measurements, aiming to identify clinically meaningful associations. RESULTS: Patients denied diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, or other symptoms related to bacterial overgrowth. Biochemical profile including enzymes was also acceptable, indicating a stable condition. Positive correlation of bacterial count in either segment of the stomach was demonstrated for BMI and gamma-glutamyl transferase, whereas negative correlation occurred regarding fasting blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: An antidiabetic role along with deleterious consequences for weight loss and liver function are possible in such circumstances. Such phenotype is broadly consistent with reported effects for the whole gut microbiome. Prospective controlled studies including molecular analysis of gastrointestinal fluid, and simultaneous profiling of the entire microbiome, are necessary to shed more light on these findings.
BACKGROUND:Patients with postbariatric bacterial overgrowth were reinvestigated after a follow-up of 15 years. It was hypothesized that systemic associations analogous to those reported for whole gut microbiome would be revealed. METHODS:Patients (n = 37, 70.3 % females, 42.4 ± 9.9 years old, preoperative BMI 53.5 ± 10.6 kg/m(2), current BMI 32.8 ± 10.8 kg/m(2)), all submitted to RYGB on account of morbid obesity, were followed during 176.8 ± 25.7 months. Blood tests included fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, liver and pancreatic enzymes, and lipid fractions. Bacterial overgrowth was diagnosed by quantitative culture of gastric fluid in both the excluded remnant and the gastric pouch, with the help of double-balloon enteroscopy. Absolute counts of aerobes and anaerobes in both gastric reservoirs were correlated with nutritional and biochemical measurements, aiming to identify clinically meaningful associations. RESULTS:Patients denied diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, or other symptoms related to bacterial overgrowth. Biochemical profile including enzymes was also acceptable, indicating a stable condition. Positive correlation of bacterial count in either segment of the stomach was demonstrated for BMI and gamma-glutamyl transferase, whereas negative correlation occurred regarding fasting blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: An antidiabetic role along with deleterious consequences for weight loss and liver function are possible in such circumstances. Such phenotype is broadly consistent with reported effects for the whole gut microbiome. Prospective controlled studies including molecular analysis of gastrointestinal fluid, and simultaneous profiling of the entire microbiome, are necessary to shed more light on these findings.
Authors: Anne Vrieze; Els Van Nood; Frits Holleman; Jarkko Salojärvi; Ruud S Kootte; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Geesje M Dallinga-Thie; Mariette T Ackermans; Mireille J Serlie; Raish Oozeer; Muriel Derrien; Anne Druesne; Johan E T Van Hylckama Vlieg; Vincent W Bloks; Albert K Groen; Hans G H J Heilig; Erwin G Zoetendal; Erik S Stroes; Willem M de Vos; Joost B L Hoekstra; Max Nieuwdorp Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Robson K Ishida; Joel Faintuch; Ana M R Paula; Christiane A Risttori; Sabrina N Silva; Elaine S Gomes; Rejane Mattar; Rogerio Kuga; Adriana S Ribeiro; Paulo Sakai; Hermes V Barbeiro; Denise F Barbeiro; Francisco G Soriano; Ivan Cecconello Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Gavitt A Woodard; Betsy Encarnacion; John R Downey; Joseph Peraza; Karen Chong; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John M Morton Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-04-18 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Emma Allen-Vercoe; Gregor Reid; Norman Viner; Gregory B Gloor; Susy Hota; Peter Kim; Christine Lee; Kieran O'Doherty; Stephen J Vanner; J Scott Weese; Elaine O Petrof Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Elaine O Petrof; Gregory B Gloor; Stephen J Vanner; Scott J Weese; David Carter; Michelle C Daigneault; Eric M Brown; Kathleen Schroeter; Emma Allen-Vercoe Journal: Microbiome Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Matthew Bohm; Andrea Shin; Sean Teagarden; Huiping Xu; Anita Gupta; Robert Siwiec; David Nelson; John M Wo Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.174
Authors: Iman Andalib; Hiral Shah; Bikram S Bal; Timothy R Shope; Frederick C Finelli; Timothy R Koch Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2015-10-11 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Thomas C C Boerlage; Floris Westerink; Dennis C W Poland; Inge L Huibregtse; Yair I Z Acherman; Victor E A Gerdes Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Yves M Borbély; Alice Osterwalder; Dino Kröll; Philipp C Nett; Roman A Inglin Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742