Literature DB >> 24817158

Slow lifelong growth predisposes Populus tremuloides trees to mortality.

Kathryn B Ireland1, Margaret M Moore, Peter Z Fulé, Thomas J Zegler, Robert E Keane.   

Abstract

Widespread dieback of aspen forests, sometimes called sudden aspen decline, has been observed throughout much of western North America, with the highest mortality rates in the southwestern United States. Recent aspen mortality has been linked to drought stress and elevated temperatures characteristic of conditions expected under climate change, but the role of individual aspen tree growth patterns in contributing to recent tree mortality is less well known. We used tree-ring data to investigate the relationship between an individual aspen tree's lifetime growth patterns and mortality. Surviving aspen trees had consistently higher average growth rates for at least 100 years than dead trees. Contrary to observations from late successional species, slow initial growth rates were not associated with a longer lifespan in aspen. Aspen trees that died had slower lifetime growth and slower growth at various stages of their lives than those that survived. Differences in average diameter growth between live and dead trees were significant (α = 0.05) across all time periods tested. Our best logistical model of aspen mortality indicates that younger aspen trees with lower recent growth rates and higher frequencies of abrupt growth declines had an increased risk of mortality. Our findings highlight the need for species-specific mortality functions in forest succession models. Size-dependent mortality functions suitable for late successional species may not be appropriate for species with different life history strategies. For some early successional species, like aspen, slow growth at various stages of the tree's life is associated with increased mortality risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24817158     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-2951-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Long-term aridity changes in the western United States.

Authors:  Edward R Cook; Connie A Woodhouse; C Mark Eakin; David M Meko; David W Stahle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Vegetation synchronously leans upslope as climate warms.

Authors:  David D Breshears; Travis E Huxman; Henry D Adams; Chris B Zou; Jennifer E Davison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States.

Authors:  Phillip J van Mantgem; Nathan L Stephenson; John C Byrne; Lori D Daniels; Jerry F Franklin; Peter Z Fulé; Mark E Harmon; Andrew J Larson; Jeremy M Smith; Alan H Taylor; Thomas T Veblen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Age class, longevity and growth rate relationships: protracted growth increases in old trees in the eastern United States.

Authors:  Sarah E Johnson; Marc D Abrams
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.196

5.  Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought.

Authors:  Alicyn R Gitlin; Christopher M Sthultz; Matthew A Bowker; Stacy Stumpf; Kristina L Paxton; Karla Kennedy; Axhel Muñoz; Joseph K Bailey; Thomas G Whitham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.560

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Size Matters a Lot: Drought-Affected Italian Oaks Are Smaller and Show Lower Growth Prior to Tree Death.

Authors:  Michele Colangelo; Jesús J Camarero; Marco Borghetti; Antonio Gazol; Tiziana Gentilesca; Francesco Ripullone
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Trade-Offs between Growth Rate, Tree Size and Lifespan of Mountain Pine (Pinus montana) in the Swiss National Park.

Authors:  Christof Bigler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.