INTRODUCTION: We evaluated renal function following partial nephrectomy with cold ischemia (CI) versus warm ischemia (WI). METHODS: Data were collected from 1,396 patients at six institutions who underwent partial nephrectomy for a renal mass with normal contralateral kidney to evaluate percent change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 3-18 months. A multivariate linear regression model tested the association of percent change GFR with clinical, operative, and pathologic factors. RESULTS: A total of 874 patients (63 %) underwent PN with CI and 522 (37 %) with WI. All patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (n = 443) had WI, whereas 92 % of open partial nephrectomy patients (n = 953) had CI. The CI group had a lower mean baseline GFR (72 vs. 80 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), longer median ischemia time (33 vs. 29 min), and larger mean tumor size (3.2 vs. 2.9 cm) with more advanced pathologic stage (T1b-T3: 25 vs. 16 %) (all p values <0.001). Patients with CI and WI demonstrated 12.3 and 10.1 % reductions in renal function from baseline, respectively (p = 0.067). Increasing age, female gender, and increasing tumor size were associated with reduction in renal function (all p values <0.001). Neither renal hypothermia nor operative technique independently predicted reduced renal function. Sensitivity analyses limited to ischemia time >30 min, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), or tumors >4 cm did not significantly alter the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, female gender, and larger tumor size independently predict a decrease in renal function following partial nephrectomy with a normal contralateral kidney. Within the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, including lack of parenchymal preservation percentage, neither surgical approach (open or laparoscopic) nor presence of hypothermia appears to be associated with long-term renal function.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated renal function following partial nephrectomy with cold ischemia (CI) versus warm ischemia (WI). METHODS: Data were collected from 1,396 patients at six institutions who underwent partial nephrectomy for a renal mass with normal contralateral kidney to evaluate percent change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 3-18 months. A multivariate linear regression model tested the association of percent change GFR with clinical, operative, and pathologic factors. RESULTS: A total of 874 patients (63 %) underwent PN with CI and 522 (37 %) with WI. All patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (n = 443) had WI, whereas 92 % of open partial nephrectomy patients (n = 953) had CI. The CI group had a lower mean baseline GFR (72 vs. 80 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), longer median ischemia time (33 vs. 29 min), and larger mean tumor size (3.2 vs. 2.9 cm) with more advanced pathologic stage (T1b-T3: 25 vs. 16 %) (all p values <0.001). Patients with CI and WI demonstrated 12.3 and 10.1 % reductions in renal function from baseline, respectively (p = 0.067). Increasing age, female gender, and increasing tumor size were associated with reduction in renal function (all p values <0.001). Neither renal hypothermia nor operative technique independently predicted reduced renal function. Sensitivity analyses limited to ischemia time >30 min, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), or tumors >4 cm did not significantly alter the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, female gender, and larger tumor size independently predict a decrease in renal function following partial nephrectomy with a normal contralateral kidney. Within the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, including lack of parenchymal preservation percentage, neither surgical approach (open or laparoscopic) nor presence of hypothermia appears to be associated with long-term renal function.
Authors: Jay Simhan; Marc C Smaldone; Kevin J Tsai; Daniel J Canter; Tianyu Li; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Maria C Mir; Rebecca A Campbell; Nidhi Sharma; Erick M Remer; Matt N Simmons; Jianbo Li; Sevag Demirjian; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell Journal: Urology Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Emil Scosyrev; Edward M Messing; Richard Sylvester; Steven Campbell; Hendrik Van Poppel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Paul Russo; Thomas L Jang; Joseph A Pettus; William C Huang; Scott E Eggener; Matthew F O'Brien; Michael E Karellas; Nicholas T Karanikolas; Megan A Kagiwada Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Fabio Crocerossa; Cristian Fiori; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Minervini; Umberto Carbonara; Savio D Pandolfo; Davide Loizzo; Daniel D Eun; Alessandro Larcher; Andrea Mari; Antonio Andrea Grosso; Fabrizio Di Maida; Lance J Hampton; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: George J S Kallingal; Joel M Weinberg; Isildinha M Reis; Avinash Nehra; Manjeri A Venkatachalam; Dipen J Parekh Journal: BJU Int Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Oscar D Martín; Heilen Bravo; Marcos Arias; Diego Dallos; Yesica Quiroz; Luis G Medina; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Raul G Carlini Journal: Oncoscience Date: 2018-02-23