Literature DB >> 24816976

[Influence of surgeon experience in total hip arthroplasty. Dependence on operating time and complication risk].

K Zenk1, S Finze, D Kluess, R Bader, J Malzahn, W Mittelmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a consequence of limited personnel and financial resources, the increase in total hip arthroplasties places higher demands on orthopedic surgeons.
OBJECTIVES: In order to maintain high quality treatment, the correlation between surgical experience, duration of surgery and risk of complications was examined.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The surgery time and, if applicable, complications (until discharge from hospital) of 1129 total hip arthroplasties over a period of 4 years were evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS: The group of most experienced surgeons needed an average time of 53.2 ± 17.6 min for each implantation, followed by moderately experienced surgeons (74.5 ± 25.5 min) and less experienced surgeons (80.8 ± 21.9 min). Of all included cases, a total of 41 complications until discharge from hospital occurred. The number of complications increased with duration of surgery, whereby the risk of complications was significantly lower for shorter surgery times conducted by the most experienced surgeons as well as moderately experienced surgeons. The complication risk of less experienced surgeons remained constant independent of surgery duration.
CONCLUSION: These results underline the recommendations of the German Endocert system, which determine a minimum number of total joint arthroplasties as a quality indicator not only for hospitals but also for individual surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24816976     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-2292-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

1.  The trainer, the trainee and the surgeons' assistant: clinical outcomes following total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Palan; A Gulati; J G Andrew; D W Murray; D J Beard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-07

2.  What are the risk factors for infection in hemiarthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties?

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero; Marisol de Dios
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Hospital volume and surgical outcomes after elective hip/knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a large regional database.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; C Kent Kwoh; Robert M Boudreau; Gwo-Chin Lee; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-08

4.  Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

Authors:  J N Katz; E Losina; J Barrett; C B Phillips; N N Mahomed; R A Lew; E Guadagnoli; W H Harris; R Poss; J A Baron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Surgeon experience and clinical and economic outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason W Hammond; William S Queale; Tae Kyun Kim; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Factors that predict short-term complication rates after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson F Soohoo; Eugene Farng; Jay R Lieberman; Lauchlan Chambers; David S Zingmond
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Factors influencing perioperative morbidity and mortality in primary hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Perka; C Paul; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Patient, hospital, and procedure characteristics influencing total hip and knee arthroplasty procedure duration.

Authors:  Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Michael Manley; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Relationship of surgical volume to short-term mortality, morbidity, and hospital charges in arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J Lavernia; J F Guzman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Hybrid and uncemented hip arthroplasty: Contribution margin in the German lump sum reimbursement system].

Authors:  Tim Hanstein; O Kumpe; W Mittelmeier; R Skripitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Does the certification according to EndoCert lead to a better quality of treatment?]

Authors:  P Weber; A C Paulus; D Hallmen; A Steinbrück; F Schmidutz; V Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  CT-based Navigation System Using a Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Component Positioning: An Experimental in vitro Study with a Sawbone Model.

Authors:  Seongpung Lee; Jun Young Kim; Jaesung Hong; Seung Hoon Baek; Shin Yoon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Tobias Renkawitz; Joachim Grifka; Markus Weber
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Impact of Acoustic and Interactive Disruptive Factors during Robot-Assisted Surgery-A Virtual Surgical Training Model.

Authors:  Magret Krüger; Johannes Ackermann; Daniar Osmonov; Veronika Günther; Dirk Bauerschlag; Johannes Hensler; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Sebastian Lippross; Georgios Gitas; Thomas Becker; Nicolai Maass; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Ibrahim Alkatout
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  [Patient safety during endoprosthetic training : Does the training of surgeons in primary hip arthroplasty at certified endoprosthesis centres lead to increased complications?]

Authors:  S Rohe; S Brodt; C Windisch; G Matziolis; S Böhle
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.