José Luis López-Campos1, Joan B Soriano2, Myriam Calle3. 1. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Sevilla, España; Centro de investigación en red de enfermedades respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España. Electronic address: lcampos@separ.es. 2. Fundación de Investigación Sanitaria de las Islas Baleares (FISIB), Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, España. 3. Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, España.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This report shows the results of a nation-wide survey on spirometry to assess regional differences. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study conducted by means of a telephone survey in 805 primary care (PC) and specialized centers (SC) in all regions. The survey contacted technicians in charge of spirometry and consisted of 36 questions related to the test. RESULTS: The results showed major differences between regions. Most centers had 1-2 spirometers. The number of spirometry tests per week ranged from 2 to 8.9 in PC and between 34.3 and 98.3 in SC. Some training had been given in most centers (63.6-100% in PC and 60.0-100% in SC) but not on a regular basis. Most centers used several short-acting bronchodilators for the bronchodilation test, but with insufficient inhalations (2.0-3.8 in PC and 2.0-3.3 in SC) and frequently incorrect waiting time (29.4-83.3% PC and 33.3-87.5% in SC). Daily calibration was not performed in all centers (0-100% in PC and 66.7-100% in SC). Significant inter-regional differences in spirometry quality criteria were observed, with 6 or more criteria met in 9.1-84.6% of PC centers and 37.5-100% in SC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the current situation of spirometry in primary and specialized care in Spain, highlighting considerable variability and areas for improvement. This information should be considered by health officials to improve the quality and accessibility of such tests.
OBJECTIVES: This report shows the results of a nation-wide survey on spirometry to assess regional differences. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study conducted by means of a telephone survey in 805 primary care (PC) and specialized centers (SC) in all regions. The survey contacted technicians in charge of spirometry and consisted of 36 questions related to the test. RESULTS: The results showed major differences between regions. Most centers had 1-2 spirometers. The number of spirometry tests per week ranged from 2 to 8.9 in PC and between 34.3 and 98.3 in SC. Some training had been given in most centers (63.6-100% in PC and 60.0-100% in SC) but not on a regular basis. Most centers used several short-acting bronchodilators for the bronchodilation test, but with insufficient inhalations (2.0-3.8 in PC and 2.0-3.3 in SC) and frequently incorrect waiting time (29.4-83.3% PC and 33.3-87.5% in SC). Daily calibration was not performed in all centers (0-100% in PC and 66.7-100% in SC). Significant inter-regional differences in spirometry quality criteria were observed, with 6 or more criteria met in 9.1-84.6% of PC centers and 37.5-100% in SC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the current situation of spirometry in primary and specialized care in Spain, highlighting considerable variability and areas for improvement. This information should be considered by health officials to improve the quality and accessibility of such tests.
Authors: Cristina Represas-Represas; Alberto Fernández-Villar; Alberto Ruano-Raviña; Ana Priegue-Carrera; Maribel Botana-Rial Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Bouza; A Alvar; P Almagro; T Alonso; J Ancochea; F Barbé; J Corbella; D Gracia; E Mascarós; J Melis; M Miravitlles; M Pastor; P Pérez; D Rudilla; A Torres; J B Soriano; A Vallano; F Vargas; E Palomo Journal: Rev Esp Quimioter Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 1.553
Authors: Jesús Molina París; Enrique Mascarós Balaguer; Daniel Ocaña Rodríguez; Pere Simonet Aineto; Carlos Campo Sien Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 1.137