Literature DB >> 24815821

Food allergy population thresholds: an evaluation of the number of oral food challenges and dosing schemes on the accuracy of threshold dose distribution modeling.

Rinke H Klein Entink1, Benjamin C Remington2, W Marty Blom2, Carina M Rubingh2, Astrid G Kruizinga2, Joseph L Baumert3, Steve L Taylor3, Geert F Houben2.   

Abstract

For most allergenic foods, limited availability of threshold dose information within the population restricts the advice on action levels of unintended allergenic foods which should trigger advisory labeling on packaged foods. The objective of this paper is to provide guidance for selecting an optimal sample size for threshold dosing studies for major allergenic foods and to identify factors influencing the accuracy of estimation. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the effects of sample size and dosing schemes on the accuracy of the threshold distribution curve. The relationships between sample size, dosing scheme and the employed statistical distribution on the one hand and accuracy of estimation on the other hand were obtained. It showed that the largest relative gains in accuracy are obtained when sample size increases from N=20 to N=60. Moreover, it showed that the EuroPrevall dosing scheme is a useful start, but that it may need revision for a specific allergen as more data become available, because a proper allocation of the dosing steps is important. The results may guide risk assessors in minimum sample sizes for new studies and in the allocation of proper dosing schemes for allergens in provocation studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergenic foods; Simulation study; Threshold dose distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815821     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  4 in total

1.  Full range of population Eliciting Dose values for 14 priority allergenic foods and recommendations for use in risk characterization.

Authors:  Geert F Houben; Joseph L Baumert; W Marty Blom; Astrid G Kruizinga; Marie Y Meima; Benjamin C Remington; Matthew W Wheeler; Joost Westerhout; Steve L Taylor
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 2.  Cashew Nut Allergy: Clinical Relevance and Allergen Characterisation.

Authors:  Cíntia Mendes; Joana Costa; António A Vicente; Maria Beatriz P P Oliveira; Isabel Mafra
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.

Authors:  Benjamin C Remington; Joost Westerhout; Marie Y Meima; W Marty Blom; Astrid G Kruizinga; Matthew W Wheeler; Steve L Taylor; Geert F Houben; Joseph L Baumert
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Minimal impact of extensive heating of hen's egg and cow's milk in a food matrix on threshold dose-distribution curves.

Authors:  B C Remington; J Westerhout; D E Campbell; P J Turner
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 13.146

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.