Literature DB >> 24815271

Interpulse interval discrimination within and across channels: comparison of monopolar and tripolar mode of stimulation.

Claire A Fielden1, Karolina Kluk1, Colette M McKay1.   

Abstract

Perception of temporal patterns is crucial to speech understanding and music perception in normal hearing, and is fundamental in the design and implementation of processing strategies for cochlear implants. Two experiments described here investigated the effect of stimulation mode (monopolar versus tripolar) on interpulse interval discrimination using single-electrode stimulation (experiment 1) and dual-electrode stimulation (experiment 2). Experiment 1 required participants to discriminate stimuli containing different interpulse intervals and experiment 2 required listeners to discriminate between two dual-electrode stimuli that had the same temporal pattern on each electrode, but differed in inter-electrode timing. The hypotheses were that (i) stimulation mode would affect the ability to distinguish interpulse interval patterns on a single electrode and (ii) the electrode separation range in which subjects were sensitive to inter-electrode timing would be more restricted in tripolar than in monopolar stimulation. Results in nine cochlear implant users showed that mode did not have a significant mean effect on either the ability to discriminate interpulse intervals in single-electrode stimulation or the range of electrode separation in dual-electrode stimulation in which participants were sensitive to inter-electrode timing. In conclusion, tripolar stimulation did not show any advantage in delivering temporal information within or across channels in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815271     DOI: 10.1121/1.4869687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott; Brett A Swanson; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06

2.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jaime Undurraga; Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.