Literature DB >> 24815258

A geospatial model of ambient sound pressure levels in the contiguous United States.

Daniel Mennitt1, Kirk Sherrill1, Kurt Fristrup1.   

Abstract

This paper presents a model that predicts measured sound pressure levels using geospatial features such as topography, climate, hydrology, and anthropogenic activity. The model utilizes random forest, a tree-based machine learning algorithm, which does not incorporate a priori knowledge of source characteristics or propagation mechanics. The response data encompasses 270 000 h of acoustical measurements from 190 sites located in National Parks across the contiguous United States. The explanatory variables were derived from national geospatial data layers and cross validation procedures were used to evaluate model performance and identify variables with predictive power. Using the model, the effects of individual explanatory variables on sound pressure level were isolated and quantified to reveal systematic trends across environmental gradients. Model performance varies by the acoustical metric of interest; the seasonal L50 can be predicted with a median absolute deviation of approximately 3 dB. The primary application for this model is to generalize point measurements to maps expressing spatial variation in ambient sound levels. An example of this mapping capability is presented for Zion National Park and Cedar Breaks National Monument in southwestern Utah.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815258     DOI: 10.1121/1.4870481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Cluster Analysis of Urban Acoustic Environments on Barcelona Sensor Network Data.

Authors:  Antonio Pita; Francisco J Rodriguez; Juan M Navarro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  A Warning About Using Predicted Values From Regression Models for Epidemiologic Inquiry.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Kara E Rudolph; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Amber Khan; Joan A Casey
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Underwater noise levels in UK waters.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Kate L Brookes; Rebecca C Faulkner; Anthony W J Bicknell; Brendan J Godley; Matthew J Witt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Environmental Influences on Sleep in the California Teachers Study Cohort.

Authors:  Charlie Zhong; Travis Longcore; Jennifer Benbow; Nadia T Chung; Khang Chau; Sophia S Wang; James V Lacey; Meredith Franklin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.363

Review 5.  Measuring acoustic habitats.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Kurt M Fristrup; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack; Matthew J Witt; Philippe Blondel; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.781

6.  Uncovering Spatial Variation in Acoustic Environments Using Sound Mapping.

Authors:  Jacob R Job; Kyle Myers; Koorosh Naghshineh; Sharon A Gill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Using bioacoustics to examine shifts in songbird phenology.

Authors:  Rachel T Buxton; Emma Brown; Lewis Sharman; Christine M Gabriele; Megan F McKenna
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.